Cited by 2,936Public Administration and GovernanceElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationPublic Policy and Administration Research

Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms

McCubbins, Mathew D., Schwartz, Thomas·1984·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

Scholars have often remarked that Congress neglects its oversight responsibility. We argue that Congress does no such thing: what appears to be a neglect of oversight really is the rational preference for one form of oversight-which we call fire-alarm oversight-over another form-police-patrol oversight. Our analysis supports a somewhat neglected way of looking at the strategies by which legislators seek to achieve their goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2110792

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interest groups, advocacy organizations, and experts monitor the administrative state for abuses and watch for backsliding.

    “Yet, just as interest groups, advocacy organizations, and experts monitor the administrative state for abuses (McCubbins & Schwartz, 1984), so do they watch for backsliding.”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as McCubbins & Schwartz, 1984

  • As a policy, justifications might enable the public to adopt a strategy more like fire alarm oversight rather than police patrol oversight: they can act when something is obviously wrong but do not need to put a lot of effort on continuous monitoring.

    “As a policy, justifications might enable the public to adopt a strategy that, in the words of McCubbins and Schwartz (1984), is more like fire alarm oversight rather than police patrol oversight: they can act when something is obviously wrong but do not need to put a lot of effort on continuous monitoring.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
165
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2333983184
Cited by
2,936
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 138 · 2012: 118
FWCI
84.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
congressional oversight, legislative strategy, legislative behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review