Cited by 130Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAbdominal Surgery and Complications

Feeding the hypotensive patient: does enteral feeding precipitate or protect against ischemic bowel?

McClave, Stephen A., Chang, Wei‐Kuo·2003·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Although the enteral route of enteral feeding is the preferred method of nutrition support for critically ill patients, this important therapeutic strategy is not without risk. In human subjects, the digestion and absorption of nutrients induce typical hemodynamic changes, consisting of an increase in mesenteric blood flow at the expense of reduced systemic blood pressure. On rare occasion when providing aggressive enteral nutrition to critically ill patients, common symptoms of gastrointestinal intolerance may progress to a syndrome of abdominal distention, hypotension, and shock, with the development of small bowel ischemia or necrosis. Although the incidence of small bowel ischemia secondary to enteral feeding is low, the overall clinical outcome is still poor and carries a high mortality rate. Enteral feeding is well tolerated and is probably beneficial in most critically ill patients before and after a period of hypotension. Although enteral nutrition may be used with caution during the period of hypotension, evidence of poor gastrointestinal function (increased nasogastric tube output, unexplained abdominal pain, and abdominal distention), or development of dilated loops of bowel or intramural gas (pneumatosis intestinalis) on radiographic studies should be interpreted as potential indicators of gut ischemia. With progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prevention of ischemic injury to the intestinal mucosa, the strategy of aggressive enteral feeding for critically ill patients may result in a reduction in this major complication and enhanced functional recovery from severe illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0115426503018004279

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClave, S. A., & Chang, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
McClave, Stephen A.
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
279-284
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W2131083917
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
enteral nutrition, hypotension, small bowel ischemia, critically ill patients, mesenteric blood flow, gastrointestinal intolerance, pneumatosis intestinalis, intestinal necrosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review