Cited by 310Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNosocomial Infections in ICUSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Early Enteral Nutrition and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients Treated With Vasopressors and Mechanical Ventilation

Khalid, I., Doshi, P., DiGiovine, B.·2010·American Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill medical patients whose hemodynamic condition is unstable. METHODS: Prospectively collected data in a multi-institutional medical intensive care unit database were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 1174 patients were identified who required mechanical ventilation for more than 2 days and were treated with vasopressor agents to support blood pressure. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received enteral nutrition (n = 707) within 48 hours of the start of mechanical ventilation, termed the early enteral nutrition group, and those who did not (n = 467), termed the late enteral nutrition group. The primary end points were overall intensive care unit and hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were used to evaluate potential confounding variables. The data were also analyzed after adjustments for confounding by matching for propensity score. RESULTS: Intensive care unit and hospital mortality were lower in the early enteral nutrition group than in the late enteral group: 22.5% vs 28.3%; P = 03; and 34.0% vs 44.0%; P < .001, respectively. The beneficial effect of early feeding was more evident in the sickest patients, that is, those treated with multiple vasopressors (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.85) and those without early improvement (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.90). When adjustments were made for confounding by matching for propensity score, early feeding was associated with decreased hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Early enteral nutrition may be associated with reduced intensive care unit and hospital mortality in patients whose hemodynamic condition is unstable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4037/ajcc2010197

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one outcome study in septic patients compared early enteral nutrition with energy target reached by day 3 after admission with late enteral nutrition and found no difference in survival or infection rate.

    “Only one outcome study in septic patients compared “early” EN with energy target reached by the 3rd day after admission with “late” EN (no nutrition until day 3 after ICU admission) and found no difference (survival or infection rate) (326).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khalid, I., Doshi, P., & DiGiovine, B.
Affiliations
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Critical Care
Published
2010-04-30
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
261-268
ISSN
  • 1062-3264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-710X
OpenAlex
W2160868159
Cited by
310
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
early enteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, critically ill medical patients, ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, hemodynamic instability, propensity score matching
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review