Cited by 141Healthcare Systems and ChallengesCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsHealth Services Management and Policy

The primary care response to COVID-19 in England's National Health Service

Open access
Majeed, Azeem, Maile, Edward John, Bindman, Andrew B·2020·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0141076820931452

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remote consultations have been playing a substantial role in the health care response to the current COVID-19 pandemic by supporting continued access to services with minimized risk of disease transmission.

    “remote consultations have been playing a substantial role in the health care response to the current COVID-19 pandemic by supporting continued access to services with minimized risk of disease transmission [2,3].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing suspected or confirmed pneumonia in adults in the community. See https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng165 (last checked 18 May 2020). 33497157

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Majeed, A., Maile, E. J., & Bindman, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Majeed, Azeem
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2020-06
Volume
113
Issue
6
Pages
208-210
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W3033478329
Cited by
138
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 8
FWCI
28.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, primary care, National Health Service, pandemic response, health care organization, England
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Change Management, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Civil Defense, England, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Pneumonia, Viral, Primary Health Care, State Medicine, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics, Quality Improvement, Health Information Exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review