Cited by 46Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentHearing Impairment and Communication

Mothers respond differently to infants’ gestural versus nongestural communicative bids

Olson, Janet, Masur, Elise Frank·2013·First Language

Abstract

Thirty infants at 1;1 and their mothers were videotaped while playing for 18 minutes. Experimental stimuli were presented in three communicative intent contexts – proto-declarative, proto-imperative, and ambiguous – to elicit infant communicative bids that did and did not contain gestures. Mothers’ responses were analyzed, and their verbal responses were further coded as object labels, action labels, internal state labels, and nonlabeling utterances. Results demonstrated differential responses to infants’ gestural and nongestural bids. Mothers responded more often and were more likely to provide a verbal response in all contexts when infants’ communicative bids included gestures. They were also more likely to provide an object label and less likely to provide nonlabeling utterances to gestural than nongestural bids in the proto-declarative and ambiguous contexts. The privileged responses following infants’ gestures may serve as a mechanism for vocabulary acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0142723713493346

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olson, J., & Masur, E. F.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Venue
First Language
Published
2013-07-19
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
372-387
ISSN
  • 0142-7237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-2344
OpenAlex
W2055223987
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
First Language (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northern Illinois University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
infant gestures, maternal responsiveness, object marking, vocabulary acquisition, mother-infant interaction, early childhood language development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review