Mothers respond differently to infants’ gestural versus nongestural communicative bids
Abstract
Thirty infants at 1;1 and their mothers were videotaped while playing for 18 minutes. Experimental stimuli were presented in three communicative intent contexts – proto-declarative, proto-imperative, and ambiguous – to elicit infant communicative bids that did and did not contain gestures. Mothers’ responses were analyzed, and their verbal responses were further coded as object labels, action labels, internal state labels, and nonlabeling utterances. Results demonstrated differential responses to infants’ gestural and nongestural bids. Mothers responded more often and were more likely to provide a verbal response in all contexts when infants’ communicative bids included gestures. They were also more likely to provide an object label and less likely to provide nonlabeling utterances to gestural than nongestural bids in the proto-declarative and ambiguous contexts. The privileged responses following infants’ gestures may serve as a mechanism for vocabulary acquisition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mothers respond more often to infants' gestural than non‐gestural communicative behaviors.
“Mothers respond more often to infants' gestural than non‐gestural communicative behaviors (Olson & Masur, 2013; van der Klis et al., 2023).”
From The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Olson & Masur, 2013
Cites
Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166214 · Cited by 2,727 · see citing works
Gesture paves the way for language development
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.x · Cited by 1,086 · see citing works
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
Twelve‐month‐olds point to share attention and interest
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2004) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00349.x · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van der Klis, A., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R. (2023) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101828 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
van der Klis, A., Junge, C., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R. (2025) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12626 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Mothers respond more often to infants' gestural than non‐gestural communicative behaviors (Olson & Masur, 2013; van der Klis et al., 2023).”
- Authors
- Olson, J., & Masur, E. F.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- ORCID
- Olson, Janet
- Venue
- First Language
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-19
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 372-387
- ISSN
- 0142-7237 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-2344
- OpenAlex
- W2055223987
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- First Language (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northern Illinois University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- infant gestures, maternal responsiveness, object marking, vocabulary acquisition, mother-infant interaction, early childhood language development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review