Cited by 107Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Respiratory biofeedback-assisted therapy in panic disorder

Open access
Meuret, Alicia E., Wilhelm, Frank H., Roth, Walton T.·2001·Behavior Modification

Abstract

The authors describe a new methodologically improved behavioral treatment for panic patients using respiratory biofeedback from a handheld capnometry device. The treatment rationale is based on the assumption that sustained hypocapnia resulting from hyperventilation is a key mechanism in the production and maintenance of panic. The brief 4-week biofeedback therapy is aimed at voluntarily increasing self-monitored end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO 2 ) and reducing respiratory rate and instability through breathing exercises in patients’ environment. Preliminary results from 4 patients indicate that the therapy was successful in reducing panic symptoms and other psychological characteristics associated with panic disorder. Physiological data obtained from home training, 24-hour ambulatory monitoring pretherapy and posttherapy, and laboratory assessment at follow-up indicate that patients started out with low resting PCO 2 levels, increased those levels during therapy, and maintained those levels at posttherapy and/or follow-up. Partial dissociation between PCO 2 and respiratory rate questions whether respiratory rate should be the main focus of breathing training in panic disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445501254006

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial case studies supported the potential usefulness of capnometry-assisted breathing training.

    “Initial case studies supported the potential usefulness of this approach (Meuret et al., 2001; Meuret et al., 2004).”

    From Feedback of end-tidal pCO2 as a therapeutic approach for panic disorder (2008) · cites this paper as Meuret et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meuret, A. E., Wilhelm, F. H., & Roth, W. T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Meuret, Alicia E.
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2001-09
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
584-605
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2062158200
Cited by
107
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 56094, R01MH056094)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
panic disorder, respiratory biofeedback, capnometry, hypocapnia, hyperventilation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, breathing exercises, self-monitoring, respiratory rate, behavior therapy, ambulatory monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Carbon Dioxide, Female, Humans, Hyperventilation, Male, Respiration, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review