Cited by 55Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Respiratory Control: Its Contribution to the Treatment of Panic Attacks: A Controlled Study

Hibbert, George A., Chan, Michael·1989·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Patients who experienced panic attacks, with or without avoidance, were treated for two weeks with either training in controlled breathing or a placebo treatment. Subsequently, both groups received a limited period of conventional anxiety treatments, most commonly in vivo exposure. Patients were subdivided into 'hyperventilators' and 'non-hyperventilators' on the basis of the conventional provocation test. Observer ratings of anxiety showed a greater improvement for the group that received breathing training, but there was no evidence that 'hyperventilators' benefited more from respiratory training than 'non-hyperventilators'. Self-report measures of anxiety, avoidance, and depression/dysphoria showed no difference between treatments. These findings suggest that training in controlled breathing is not of specific benefit for those identified as 'hyperventilators' by the provocation test, but that it may have a non-specific effect in the treatment of patients with panic attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.154.2.232

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hibbert and Chan (1989) found BRT and supportive therapy equal in the first two weeks, but after exposure training BRT produced more clinician-rated improvement, though not more self-reported improvement.

    “The interventions were equally effective in the first 2-week phase, but BRT yielded greater improvement in clinician (but not self-report) ratings than supportive therapy following the additional exposure training.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hibbert, G. A., & Chan, M.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1989-02
Volume
154
Issue
2
Pages
232-236
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2017550032
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
panic attacks, breath control, respiratory control, hyperventilation, provocation tests, in vivo exposure, avoidance, anxiety treatment, non-specific treatment effects, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Breathing Exercises, Clinical Trials as Topic, Fear, Female, Humans, Hyperventilation, Male, Middle Aged, Panic, Phobic Disorders, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review