Cited by 54Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Older Adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Therapist Manual for Primary Care Settings

Stanley, Melinda A., Diefenbach, Gretchen J., Hopko, Derek R.·2004·Behavior Modification

Abstract

At least four academic clinical trials have demonstrated the utility of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). These data may not generalize, however, to more heterogeneous and functionally impaired patients and the medical settings in which they typically receive care. A recent pilot project suggested the potential benefits of a new version of CBT for GAD among older patients in primary care. The manual developed and tested in this pilot project is presented here. Treatment components include motivation and education, relaxation skills, cognitive therapy, problem-solving-skills training, exposure exercises, and sleep-management-skills training. Procedures are designed to be administered flexibly to maximize attention to individual patient needs. Examples of session summaries, patient handouts, and homework forms are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445503259259

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CBT protocol used in this study was based on elements of earlier CBT protocols for generalized anxiety disorder in younger adults and was modified for flexible delivery to older adults in primary care.

    “The CBT protocol utilized in this study is based on elements of prior CBT protocols for GAD in younger adults (Borkovec & Costello, 1993; Craske, Barlow, & O’Leary, 1992) and modified to include a flexible delivery format to meet the needs of older adults in primary care medical settings (Stanley, Diefenbach, & Hopko, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanley, M. A., Diefenbach, G. J., & Hopko, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Texas Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2004-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
73-117
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2040944543
Cited by
54
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH53932, R01MH053932)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, older adults, primary care, treatment manual, relaxation techniques, problem-solving training, sleep management, motivation, cognitive therapy, homework
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Manuals as Topic, Pilot Projects, Primary Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review