The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Alternative Method for Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Researches: Percentage of Data Points Exceeding the Median
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is twofold: (a) to compare the validation of percentage of nonoverlapping data approach and percentage of data points exceeding the median of baseline phase (PEM) approach, and (b) to demonstrate application of the PEM approach in conducting a quantitative synthesis of single-subject research investigating the effectiveness of self-control. The results show that the PEM had higher Spearman correlation with original authors’judgment than PND did. The results of applying the PEM approach to synthesize the effect of self-control training on academic and social behavior showed that the treatment was highly or at least moderately effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Stahmer, A. C., & Schreibman, L. (1992) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-447 · Cited by 233
Improving Learning Disabled Students' Composition Skills: Self-Control Strategy Training
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1985) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.2307/1510905 · Cited by 157
Cited by
An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006 · Cited by 1,126
Effect Size in Single-Case Research: A Review of Nine Nonoverlap Techniques
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445511399147 · Cited by 841
Evaluating Intervention Effects in Single‐Case Research Designs
Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12038 · Cited by 665
The Improvement Rate Difference for Single-Case Research
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290907500201 · Cited by 406
Academic Benefits of Peer Tutoring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Single-Case Research
Bowman-Perrott, L., Davis, H., Vannest, K., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., & Parker, R. (2013) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2013.12087490 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, H.-H.
- Venue
- Behavior Modification
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 598-617
- ISSN
- 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4167
- OpenAlex
- W2168069101
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Alternative Method for Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Researches: Percentage of Data Points Exceeding the Median. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0145445504272974
- The paper
- Ma, H.-H. (2006). An Alternative Method for Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Researches: Percentage of Data Points Exceeding the Median. Behavior Modification. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445504272974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
