Cited by 22Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Systematic Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Caregivers, and Staff

Garcia, Yors, Keller-Collins, Anastasia, Andrews, Meredith, Kurumiya, Yukie, Imlay, Kaleiya, Umphrey, Brandon, Foster, Elizabeth·2022·Behavior Modification

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to quantitatively synthesize studies using acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NNDs), their parents, and staff members that support them. Thirty studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2006 and 2020 met inclusion criteria. They were reviewed and coded on variables associated with participants' characteristics, settings, dropouts, design type, ACT procedures and measures, social validity, treatment integrity, and main findings. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) were applied to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results indicated that 20 studies used group designs and 10 studies used single-case designs. Participants with NNDs consisted predominantly of those with autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and learning disabilities. Group studies reported process and outcome measures exclusively; whereas, single-case studies also incorporated behavioral/direct measures. Overall, results showed mixed improvements across studies using indirect and direct measures. Lastly, quality assessment for group studies presented moderate or serious risk of bias and two single-case studies did not meet WWC evidence of effectiveness. Directions for future research and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01454455211027301

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia, Y., Keller-Collins, A., Andrews, M., Kurumiya, Y., Imlay, K., Umphrey, B., & Foster, E.
Affiliations
  • The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, IL, USA
  • The Chicago School (US)
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2021-06-21
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1236-1274
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W3175308192
Cited by
22
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disabilities, caregivers, workers, implementation fidelity, social validity, group therapy, single-case experimental design, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Caregivers, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review