Cited by 76Family and Disability Support ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Interventions to Promote Well-Being in Parents of Children with Autism: a Systematic Review

Frantz, Rebecca, Hansen, Sarah Grace, Machalicek, Wendy·2018·Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40489-017-0123-3

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frantz, R., Hansen, S. G., & Machalicek, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Hansen, Sarah Grace
Venue
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
58-77
ISSN
  • 2195-7177 (ISSN-L)
  • 2195-7185
OpenAlex
W2770075862
Cited by
76
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parents of autistic children, parental well-being, parental stress, parenting support, caregiver burden, intervention effectiveness, evidence base

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review