Cited by 104Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFamily and Disability Support ResearchStress and Burnout Research

Acceptance and mindfulness-based stress management for support staff caring for individuals with intellectual disabilities

Open access
McConachie, Douglas Alexander James, McKenzie, Karen, Morris, Paul Graham, Walley, Robert M.·2014·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Unlabelled Support staff working with individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and challenging behaviour experience high levels of work-related stress. Preliminary theoretical and experimental research has highlighted the potential suitability of acceptance and mindfulness approaches for addressing support staff stress. This study examines the effectiveness of an acceptance and mindfulness-based stress management workshop on the levels of psychological distress and well-being of support staff working with individuals with ID and challenging behaviour. Support staff (n=120) were randomly assigned to a workshop intervention condition (n=66) or to a waiting list control condition (n=54). Measurements were completed at three time points (pre-, post and 6 week follow-up) for: psychological distress, well-being, perceived work stressors, thought suppression, and emotional avoidance/psychological inflexibility.Main findings The intervention led to significantly greater reductions in distress in the intervention group than in the control group. This was largely maintained at 6 week follow-up. This effect was more pronounced amongst a subsample that had shown higher levels of psychological distress at baseline. Thought suppression was found to reduce significantly in the intervention group between post intervention and follow-up, although no significant change was found in well-being or experiential avoidance/psychological inflexibility. Overall, results demonstrated support for the effectiveness of an acceptance and mindfulness-based intervention in reducing distress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.005

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bethay, J. S. (2010). Acceptance and commitment training to address burnout and stress in staff working with people with intellectual disabilities. [Dissertation]. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 70(11-B), 7249.
  2. Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Winton, A. S. W., Curtis, W. J., Wahler, R. G., Sabaawi, M., . . . McAleavey, K. (2006). Mindful staff increase learning and reduce aggression in adults with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(5), 545-558.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McConachie, D. A. J., McKenzie, K., Morris, P. G., & Walley, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1216-1227
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073466729
Cited by
103
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, support staff, intellectual disability, behavioral problems, occupational stress, psychological distress, well-being, thought suppression, experiential avoidance, psychological inflexibility, workshop intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Young Adult, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review