Cited by 82Communication in Education and HealthcareAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStuttering Research and Treatment

Measuring public speaking anxiety: Self-report, behavioral, and physiological

Open access
Gallego, Ana, McHugh, Louise, Penttonen, Markku, Lappalainen, Raimo·2022·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Self-reports are typically used to assess public speaking anxiety. In this study, we examined whether self-report, observer report, and behavioral and physiological reactivity were associated with each other during a speech challenge task. A total of 95 university students completed a self-report measure of public speaking anxiety before and after the speech challenge. Speech duration (i.e., behavioral measure), physiological reactivity, as well as speech performance evaluated by the participants and observers were also recorded. The results suggest that self-reported public speaking anxiety predicts speech duration, as well as speech quality, as rated by the participants themselves and observers. However, the physiological measures were not associated with self-reported anxiety during the speech task. Additionally, we observed that socially anxious participants underrate their speech performance in comparison to their observers' evaluations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445521994308

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Daly J. A. McCroskey J. C. Ayres J. Hopf T. Ayres D. M. (1997). Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, & communication apprehension (2nd ed.). Hampton Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallego, A., McHugh, L., Penttonen, M., & Lappalainen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Gallego, Ana
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2021-02-16
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
782-798
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W3131406743
Cited by
82
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
jyvaskylan yliopisto (04-2017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
Keywords
public speaking anxiety, self-report, observer ratings, speech duration, speech quality, physiological reactivity, social anxiety, self-evaluation of performance, university students
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Speech, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review