Cited by 49Communication in Education and HealthcareAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Examining the relationship between public speaking anxiety, distress tolerance and psychological flexibility

Open access
Gallego, Ana, McHugh, Louise, Villatte, Matthieu, Lappalainen, Raimo·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.04.003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In relation to Gallego et al.'s (2020) non-clinical sample, John's baseline CompACT BA score was at the 5th percentile, indicating low levels of mindful attention to current actions.

    “and low levels of mindful attention to current actions (BA: 5th percentile).”
  • In relation to Gallego et al.'s (2020) non-clinical sample, John's baseline CompACT OE score was at the 4th percentile, indicating low willingness to experience internal events without attempting to avoid or control them.

    “in relation to Gallego et al . ' s (2020) non-clinical sample, John ' s baseline scores showed low willingness to experience internal events without attempting to avoid or control them (OE: 4th percentile)”
  • Changes in different psychological flexibility skills may predict changes in different kinds of distress.

    “These results suggest that changes in different psychological flexibility skills may predict changes in different kind of distress, which is congruent with Gallego, McHugh, Villatte, and Lappalainen (2020) and Kinnunen, Puolakanaho, Tolvanen, Mäkikangas, and Lappalainen (2020), who found that different aspects of mindfulness and psychological inflexibility may be related to different psychological”

    From The effectiveness of a five-session workshop on the distress of international students in Finland – a pilot study. (2023) · cites this paper as Gallego, McHugh, Villatte, and Lappalainen (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallego, A., McHugh, L., Villatte, M., & Lappalainen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Bastyr University (US)
Corresponding author
Gallego, Ana
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
16
Pages
128-133
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016314611
Cited by
49
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Student Life, University of Jyvaskyla
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
public speaking anxiety, distress tolerance, psychological flexibility, openness to experience, cognitive fusion, speech duration, university students, behavioral awareness, valued action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review