Cited by 210Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive Bias in Eating Disorders: Implications for Theory and Treatment

Williamson, Donald A., Muller, Stephanie L., Reas, Deborah L., Thaw, Jean M.·1999·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Research testing the predictions of cognitive-behavioral theory related to the psychopathology of eating disorders has lagged behind treatment outcome research. Central to cognitive theories of eating disorders is the hypothesis that beliefs and expectancies pertaining to body size and to eating are biased in favor of selectively processing information related to fatness/thinness, dieting, and control of food intake or body weight. In recent years, controlled investigations of the predictions of cognitive theories of eating disorders have yielded empirical support for these theories. This paper reviews research which has tested the predictions of cognitive-behavioral theory and discusses the implications of these findings for the treatment of eating disorders. Understanding of information processing biases may assist the clinician in understanding a range of psychopathological features of anorexia and bulimia nervosa, including denial, resistance to treatment, and misinterpretation of therapeutic interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445599234003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, D. A., Muller, S. L., Reas, D. L., & Thaw, J. M.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
1999-10
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
556-577
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2152012714
Cited by
210
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive biases, eating disorders, cognitive-behavioral theory, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating expectancies, information processing biases, treatment resistance, denial
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude, Body Constitution, Body Image, Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Models, Psychological, Obsessive Behavior, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review