Cited by 83Diabetes Management and EducationHealth disparities and outcomesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Race/ethnicity, social support, and associations with diabetes self-care and clinical outcomes in NHANES.

Open access
Rees, Courtney A., Karter, Andrew J., Young, Bessie A.·2010·The Diabetes Educator

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate how social support and race/ethnicity were associated with diabetes self-care behaviors and clinical outcomes. Methods Using the cross-sectional 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the authors examined white, black, and Latino respondents who self-reported a diabetes diagnosis (n = 450), estimating the associations of social support on diabetes outcomes. The primary exposure was a social support index (0-5), which assessed the number of sources of support in one’s life. Outcomes were self-care behaviors (controlling weight, exercising, controlling fat/caloric intake, checking feet, and self-monitoring blood glucose) and intermediate clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1C, diastolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein [LDL]). Results There were no differences in social support by race/ethnicity. The authors observed several significant race/ethnicity by social support interactions in adjusted models, controlling for age, gender, education, self-reported health, depression, functional disability, insurance status, and insulin use. Among blacks, social support was associated with controlling weight (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, P = .03), exercising (OR = 1.38, P = .03), controlling fat/ calories (OR = 1.84, P = .03), and lower diastolic blood pressure (β = -3.07, P = .02). Among whites, social support was associated with lower LDL (β = -9.45, P = .01). No significant effects were noted for Latinos. Conclusions The relationship of social support with diabetes management differed by race/ethnicity, with the strongest findings among blacks. Social support may be influential for maintaining self-care behaviors among blacks and controlling lipid levels among whites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721710364419

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Babbie ER Chapter 6: Indexes, scales, and typologies The Practice of Social Research 11th Florence, KY Cengage Learning 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rees, C. A., Karter, A. J., & Young, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Published
2010-03-23
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
435-445
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
OpenAlex
W2130614748
Cited by
83
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS013853, T32HS013853)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 DKO79745-01)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK080726, R01DK081796, R01DK065664)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes self-care, social support, race and ethnicity, racial disparities, diabetes management, HbA1c, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, weight management, physical activity, dietary fat intake, foot self-examination, self-monitoring of blood glucose, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, White Americans
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Diabetic, Ethnicity, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Self Care, Social Support, Health Behavior, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review