Cited by 128Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersMental Health and Patient Involvement

Models of peer support to remediate post-intensive care syndrome: A report developed by the society of critical care medicine thrive international peer support collaborative.

Open access
McPeake, Joanne, Hirshberg, Eliotte L., Christie, Leeann M., Drumright, Kelly, Haines, Kimberley, Hough, Catherine L., Meyer, Joel, Wade, Dorothy +37 more·2019·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: Patients and caregivers can experience a range of physical, psychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge. The use of peer support has been proposed as an innovative support mechanism. Design: We sought to identify technical, safety, and procedural aspects of existing operational models of peer support, among the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive Peer Support Collaborative. We also sought to categorize key distinctions between these models and elucidate barriers and facilitators to implementation. Subjects and Setting: Seventeen Thrive sites from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia were represented by a range of healthcare professionals. Measurements and Main Results: Via an iterative process of in-person and email/conference calls, members of the Collaborative defined the key areas on which peer support models could be defined and compared, collected detailed self-reports from all sites, reviewed the information, and identified clusters of models. Barriers and challenges to implementation of peer support models were also documented. Within the Thrive Collaborative, six general models of peer support were identified: community based, psychologist-led outpatient, models-based within ICU follow-up clinics, online, groups based within ICU, and peer mentor models. The most common barriers to implementation were recruitment to groups, personnel input and training, sustainability and funding, risk management, and measuring success. Conclusions: A number of different models of peer support are currently being developed to help patients and families recover and grow in the postcritical care setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003497

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With increased recognition of post-intensive care syndrome, peer support represents a patient-centered approach to improve long-term outcomes.

    “With increased recognition of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) in survivors of critical illness and their families, peer support represents a patient-centered approach to improve long-term outcomes [552, 553].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Guba EG, & Lincoln YS (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research In Denzin NK & Lincoln YS (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105– 117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McPeake, J., Hirshberg, E. L., Christie, L. M., Drumright, K., Haines, K., Hough, C. L., Meyer, J., Wade, D., Andrews, A., Bakhru, R., Bates, S., Barwise, J. A., Bastarache, J., Beesley, S. J., Boehm, L. M., Brown, S., Clay, A. S., Firshman, P., Greenberg, S., Harris, W., Hill, C., Hodgson, C., Holdsworth, C., Hope, A. A., Hopkins, R. O., Howell, D. C. J., Janssen, A., Jackson, J. C., Johnson, A., Kross, E. K., Lamas, D., MacLeod-Smith, B., Mandel, R., Marshall, J., Mikkelsen, M. E., Nackino, M., Quasim, T., Sevin, C. M., Slack, A., Spurr, R., Still, M., Thompson, C., Weinhouse, G., Wilcox, M. E., & Iwashyna, T. J.
Affiliations
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB)
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US)
  • Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Society of Critical Care Medicine (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Western Health (AU)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Endeavor Health (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Jay B Langer Critical Care System, New York, NY.
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
  • Emory Healthcare (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Toronto Western Hospital (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2019-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
e21-e27
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901707209
Cited by
128
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
22.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K12HL137943, K01HL140279, K12HL138039)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
peer support, post-intensive care syndrome, implementation barriers, peer mentoring, online peer support, risk management
MeSH terms
Continuity of Patient Care, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Patient Discharge, Peer Group, Social Support, Critical Illness, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review