The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases Prosocial Attitudes and Behavior
Abstract
From the perspective of terror management theory, reminders of mortality should intensify the desire to express culturally prescribed prosocial attitudes and engage in culturally prescribed prosocial behaviors. Two studies supported these hypotheses. In Study 1, people were interviewed in close proximity to a funeral home or several blocks away and were asked to indicate their attitudes toward two charities they deemed important. Those who were interviewed in front of the funeral home reported more favorability toward these charities than those who were interviewed several blocks away. In Study 2, the authors found that following mortality salience, people gave more money to a charity supporting an American cause than people who had been exposed to an aversive control topic. However, mortality salience had no effect on the amount of money given to a foreign cause. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since cultural norms often encourage both generosity and the accumulation of material wealth simultaneously, the terror management literature on people's monetary behaviors and attitudes reveals seemingly contradictory results suggesting that mortality salience paradoxically leads to both generosity (H2, H4a, H4b, and H4c) and greed (H4d and H4e) (Jonas et al., 2002; Jonas et al., 2013; K”
In the citing paper
“Indeed, MS has been shown to motivate people to defend and uphold the prominence of their cultural systems by lashing out at threats [9], but also by giving to a local charitable organization [23].”
From An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, MS increases donations to charities, particularly when the charity aims to help the individuals' own community [23,56].”
From An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5 · Cited by 3,143
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60016-7 · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationReinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness.
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C. L., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481 · Cited by 1,467
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308 · Cited by 1,412
Self-citationMcAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.62.6.1003 · Cited by 1,339
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681 · Cited by 1,323 · cited 6×
“…mortality salience increases rewards recommended for a hero and punishment recommended for a moral transgressor (Florian & Mikulincer, 1997; Ochsmann & Reichelt, 1994; Rosenblatt et al., 1989) by showing a similar effect of mortality salience on the value people place on charitable organizations.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationSolomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7 · Cited by 1,296 · cited 1×
“Trait self-esteem is negatively correlated with trait anxiety and anxiety-related problems, and threats to self-esteem increase anxiety (for a review, see Solomon et al., 1991).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRelative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis
Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationA Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When Norms Do and Do not Affect Behavior
Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002610009 · Cited by 1,005
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Becker, E., 1962, The birth and death of meaning
- Becker, E., 1971, The birth and death of meaning
- Becker, E., 1973, The denial of death
- Brown, R., 1978, Differentiation between social groups
- Carson, E. D., 1990, Faith and philanthrophy in America
- Dickens, C., 1950, A Christmas carol
- Erickson, E. H., 1963, Childhood and society
- 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003 · DOI · Paper page
- Myers, D. C., 1992, The pursuit of happiness
- Ochsmann, R., 1994, Depreciating of and distancing from foreigners: Effects of mortality salience
- Ochsmann, R., 1994, Evaluation of moral and immoral behavior: Evidence for terror management theory
- Rimor, M., 1990, Faith and philanthrophy in America
- 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.35 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationBekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764010380927 · Cited by 1,503
Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352321 · Cited by 1,188
In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror.
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10478-000 · Cited by 685
Self-citationA Terror Management Analysis of the Psychological Functions of Religion
Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309351165 · Cited by 461
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jonas, Eva
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1342-1353
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2049867294
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- mortality salience, terror management theory, prosocial attitudes, prosocial behavior, charitable giving, cultural values, fear of death
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
