Cited by 213Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimism and Attentional Bias for Negative and Positive Stimuli

Segerstrom, Suzanne C.·2001·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Optimism, or positive outcome expectancy, correlates with better psychological and physiological adjustment, in part because of conscious behavior such as coping. However, procedural, automatic, and unconscious processes also may affect adjustment. The emotional Stroop task was used to assess the relationships between optimism and unconscious attentional bias for positively valenced, negatively valenced, neutral current concern, and neutral control stimuli. Undergraduate students (n = 48) completed personality measures at the beginning of the semester and completed the Stroop task under separate cover. Optimism was associated with a greater attentional bias for positive stimuli relative to negative stimuli. Optimism also was associated with slower skin conductance response rates during negative stimuli. Unconscious attentional biases may contribute to the better adjustment associated with optimism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672012710009

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bruner, J. S., 1957, Psychological Bulletin, 64, 123
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Fiske, S. T., 1991, Social cognition
  4. Higgins, E. T., 1989, Unintended thought, 75
  5. 10.1037/0278-6133.13.4.299 · DOI
  6. 1977, Roget’s International Thesaurus
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1024 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1257 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.640 · DOI
  11. Spielberger, C. D., 1983, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Segerstrom, S. C.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Segerstrom, Suzanne C.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2001-10
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
1334-1343
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1969094803
Cited by
213
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
optimism, attentional bias, emotional Stroop task, unconscious attention, outcome expectations, positive valence, negative valence, skin conductance response, emotional adjustment, automatic processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review