CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 211Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is this about You or Me? Self-Versus Other-Directed Judgments and Feelings in Response to Intergroup Interaction

Vorauer, Jacquie D., Kumhyr, Sandra M.·2001·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167201276006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research demonstrated that both dominant and lower status group members’ responses to interacting with an out-group member can center largely on thoughts and feelings about themselves. Pairs of students (either two White Canadians or one White Canadian and one Aboriginal Canadian) had casual get-acquainted discussions. Consistent with our hypothesis that individuals would tend to frame the interaction in terms of the other person’s evaluation of them, high-prejudice White Canadians felt stereotyped by an Aboriginal partner even though they actually were not stereotyped and even though they themselves did not stereotype an Aboriginal partner. Moreover, Aboriginal Canadians appeared to personalize negative behaviors exhibited by their White partner. These individuals experienced discomfort and self-directed negative affect—but not other-directed negative affect—when their White partner was high in prejudice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167201276006

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Altemeyer, B., 1988, Enemies of freedom
  2. Devine, P. G., 1996, Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context
  3. Goffman, E., 1959, The presentation of self in everyday life
  4. Kenny, D., 1994, Interpersonal perception

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–211 of 211

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Vorauer, Jacquie D.
ORCID
Vorauer, Jacquie D.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
706-719
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167201276006
OpenAlex
W1999615224
Cited by
210
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
31.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
intergroup interaction, prejudice, stereotyping, personalization, status differences, Aboriginal Canadians, interracial contact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review