The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What We Regret Most... and Why
Open accessAbstract
Which domains in life produce the greatest potential for regret, and what features of those life domains explain why? Using archival and laboratory evidence, the authors show that greater perceived opportunity within life domains evokes more intense regret. This pattern is consistent with previous publications demonstrating greater regret stemming from high rather than low opportunity or choice. A meta-analysis of 11 regret ranking studies revealed that the top six biggest regrets in life center on (in descending order) education, career, romance, parenting, the self, and leisure. Study Set 2 provided new laboratory evidence that directly linked the regret ranking to perceived opportunity. Study Set 3 ruled out an alternative interpretation involving framing effects. Overall, these findings show that people’s biggest regrets are a reflection of where in life they see their largest opportunities; that is, where they see tangible prospects for change, growth, and renewal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995 · Cited by 2,878
Roese, N. J. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133 · Cited by 1,156 · cited 1×
“Recent research on regret has pinpointed numerous cognitive consequences, including effects on blame, expectancies, superstition, suspicion, and ongoing behavior (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002; Roese, 1997, 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFrisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.92 · Cited by 1,075
Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom.
Schwartz, B. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.79 · Cited by 875
Cited by
"I regretted the minute I pressed share": a qualitative study of regrets on Facebook
Wang, Y., Norcie, G., Komanduri, S., Acquisti, A., Leon, P. G., & Cranor, L. F. (2011) · Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2078827.2078841 · Cited by 479
Parent and Child Traits Associated with Overparenting
Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2013) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.6.569 · Cited by 265
Sexual Regret: Evidence for Evolved Sex Differences
Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Poore, J., von Hippel, W., Buss, D. M., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0019-3 · Cited by 101
Wrosch, C., Dunne, E., Scheier, M. F., & Schulz, R. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9051-x · Cited by 81
“…“what would have happened if . . .”; Kahneman, 1995), frequently associated with major developmental pathway decisions in the work and family domains (e.g., not having finished a university education or having married the wrong person, Wrosch and Heckhausen, 2002; Roese and Summerville, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking
Roese, N. J., & Morrison, M. (2009) · GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences · doi:10.12759/hsr.34.2009.2.16-26 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1273-1285
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2074081748
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What We Regret Most... and Why. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167205274693
- The paper
- Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. (2005). What We Regret Most... and Why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
