The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Good Feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious Differences in Ideal Affect
Abstract
Affect valuation theory (AVT) predicts cultural variation in the affective states that people ideally want to feel (i.e., “ideal affect”). National and ethnic comparisons support this prediction: For instance, European Americans (EA) value high arousal positive (HAP) states (e.g., excitement) more and low arousal positive (LAP) states (e.g., calm) less than Hong Kong Chinese. In this article, the authors examine whether religions differ in the ideal affective states they endorse. The authors predicted that Christianity values HAP more and LAP less than Buddhism. In Study 1, they compared Christian and Buddhist practitioners' ideal affect. In Studies 2 and 3, they compared the endorsement of HAP and LAP in Christian and Buddhist classical texts (e.g., Gospels, Lotus Sutra) and contemporary self-help books (e.g., Your Best Life Now, Art of Happiness). Findings supported predictions, suggesting that AVT applies to religious and to national and ethnic cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Happiness Is a Stochastic Phenomenon
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x · Cited by 1,719
The Meaning of “Being Chinese” and “Being American”: Variation among Chinese American Young Adults
Tsai, J. L., Ying, Y.-W., & Lee, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022100031003002 · Cited by 502
Self-citation
Cited by
Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610375557 · Cited by 1,625
Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications.
McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014213 · Cited by 1,162
Ideal Affect: Cultural Causes and Behavioral Consequences
Tsai, J. L. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00043.x · Cited by 781
Self-citationThe role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations.
Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.66 · Cited by 601
Social Class Culture Cycles: How Three Gateway Contexts Shape Selves and Fuel Inequality
Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Phillips, L. T. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, J. L., Miao, F. F., & Seppala, E.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 409-421
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2156936654
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good Feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious Differences in Ideal Affect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167206296107
- The paper
- Tsai, J. L., Miao, F. F., & Seppala, E. (2007). Good Feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious Differences in Ideal Affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.