Cited by 539Social and Cultural DynamicsCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Social Class Culture Cycles: How Three Gateway Contexts Shape Selves and Fuel Inequality

Open access
Stephens, Nicole M., Markus, Hazel Rose, Phillips, L. Taylor·2014·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

America's unprecedented levels of inequality have far-reaching negative consequences for society as a whole. Although differential access to resources contributes to inequality, the current review illuminates how ongoing participation in different social class contexts also gives rise to culture-specific selves and patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting. We integrate a growing body of interdisciplinary research to reveal how social class culture cycles operate over the course of the lifespan and through critical gateway contexts, including homes, schools, and workplaces. We first document how each of these contexts socializes social class cultural differences. Then, we demonstrate how these gateway institutions, which could provide access to upward social mobility, are structured according to middle-class ways of being a self and thus can fuel and perpetuate inequality. We conclude with a discussion of intervention opportunities that can reduce inequality by taking into account the contextual responsiveness of the self.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the U.S., some contexts such as working-class or African American contexts highly value interdependence.

    “Within the U.S., there are some contexts, such as working class or African American contexts, where interdependence is highly valued (Stephens, Markus, & Phillips, 2014; Brannon, Markus, & Taylor, 2015).”

    From Culture and Healthy Eating: The Role of Independence and Interdependence in the United States and Japan (2016) · cites this paper as Stephens, Markus, & Phillips, 2014

    The section “Different Selves: Expressive Independence Versus Hard Interdependence” says working-class contexts tend to foster norms of hard interdependence. The passages do not establish the same point for African American contexts, so that example is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Working-class contexts in the Western world are associated with interdependence and with less healthy eating.

    “Because working class contexts have also been associated with interdependence (Stephens et al., 2014) and less healthy eating habits (e.g., Darmon & Drewnowski, 2008), in the Western world”
  • Expressive independence is typical of those who grow up in affluent, middle-class contexts.

    “The other type of self the authors identify is ‘expressive independence’, which is argued to be typical of those who grow up in affluent, middle‐class contexts.”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Stephens, Markus, and Phillips (2014)

  • Social class gives rise to culture-specific selves and patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting.

    “they argue that social class gives rise to culture‐specific selves and patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Stephens, Markus, and Phillips (2014)

  • Middle-class schools and workplaces use expressive independence as a standard for measuring success, and thereby create institutional barriers to upward social mobility.

    “They also argue that middle‐class schools and workplaces use expressive independence as a standard for measuring success, and thereby create institutional barriers to upward social mobility.”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Stephens, Markus, and Phillips (2014)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bacon N, Storey J. 1996. Individualism and collectivism and the changing role of trade unions. In The New Workplace and Trade Unionism, ed. P Ackers, C Smith, P Smith, pp. 41-76. London: Routledge
  2. Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, Swidler A, Tipton SM. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  3. Bernstein B. 1974. Class, Codes and Control. Volume 3: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions. New York: Routledge
  4. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Carnevale AP, Rose SJ. 2004. Socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and selective college admissions. In America's Untapped Resource: Low-Income Students in Higher Education, ed. RD Kahlenberg, pp. 101-56. New York: Century Found.
  6. Hochschild JL. 1996. Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Kawachi I, Kennedy E. 2002. The Health of Nations: Why Inequality Is Harmful to Your Health. New Press
  8. Kusserow A. 2004. American Individualisms: Child Rearing and Social Class in Three Neighborhoods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  9. Kusserow A. 2012. When hard and soft clash: class-based individualisms in Manhattan and Queens. See Fiske & Markus 2012, pp. 195-215
  10. Lamont M. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press
  11. Lareau A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Race, Class, and Family Life. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  12. Lareau A, Calarco JM. 2012. Class, cultural capital, and institutions: the case of families and schools. See Fiske & Markus 2012, pp. 61-86
  13. Markus HR, Conner A. 2013. Clash! 8 Cultural Conflicts That Make Us Who We Are. New York: Hudson St. Press
  14. Markus HR, Hamedani MG. 2007. Sociocultural psychology: the dynamic interdependence among self systems and social systems. In Handbook of Cultural Psychology, ed. S Kitayama, D Cohen, pp. 3-39. New York: Guilford
  15. Miller PJ, Sperry DE. 2012. Déjà vu: the continuing misrecognition of low-income children's verbal abilities. See Fiske & Markus 2012, pp. 109-30
  16. Mills CW. 2002. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  17. Pattillo-McCoy M. 1999. Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril Among the Black Middle Class. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  18. Phillips M. 2011. Parenting, time wise, and disparities in academic outcomes. See Duncan & Murnane 2011, 10:207-28
  19. Reardon SF. 2011. The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: new evidence and possible explanations. See Duncan & Murnane 2011, 5:91-116
  20. Reay D. 1998. Class Work: Mothers' Involvement in Their Children's Primary Schooling. London: Univ. Coll. Lond. Press
  21. Ridgeway CL, Fisk SR. 2012. Class rules, status dynamics, and "gateway" interactions. See Fiske & Markus 2012, pp. 131-51
  22. Saez E. 2010. The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2008 Estimates). Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  23. Salzinger L. 2003. Genders in Production: Making Workers in Mexico's Global Factories. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  24. Stephens NM, Fryberg SA, Markus HR. 2012a. It's your choice: how the middle-class model of independence disadvantages working-class Americans. See Fiske & Markus 2012, pp. 87-106
  25. Wilkinson RG. 2002. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. New York: Routledge
  26. Williams JC. 2012. The class culture gap. See Fiske & Markus 2012, pp. 39-58

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Phillips, L. T.
Affiliations
  • 1Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201; email: n-stephens@kellogg.northwestern.edu
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2014-01-03
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
611-634
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2161430222
Cited by
539
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social class, social inequality, socialization, middle class, social mobility, home, schools, workplace, lifespan development, contextual responsiveness
MeSH terms
Culture, Educational Status, Family, Humans, Schools, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review