CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 466Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchBehavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promotion Orientation Explains Why Future-Oriented People Exercise and Eat Healthy: Evidence From the Two-Factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale

Joireman, Jeff, Shaffer, Monte J., Balliet, Daniel, Strathman, Alan·2012·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167212449362
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors extended research linking individual differences in consideration of future consequences (CFC) with health behaviors by (a) testing whether individual differences in regulatory focus would mediate that link and (b) highlighting the value of a revised, two-factor CFC-14 scale with subscales assessing concern with future consequences (CFC-Future) and concern with immediate consequences (CFC-Immediate) proper. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the revised CFC-14 scale supported the presence of two highly reliable factors (CFC-Future and CFC-Immediate; αs from .80 to .84). Moreover, structural equation modeling showed that those high in CFC-Future engage in exercise and healthy eating because they adopt a promotion orientation. Future use of the two-factor CFC-14 scale is encouraged to shed additional light on how concern with future and concern with immediate consequences (proper) differentially impact the way people resolve a host of intertemporal dilemmas (e.g., health, financial, and environmental behavior).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167212449362

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–462 of 462

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Missouri (US)
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-07-25
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
1272-1287
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167212449362
OpenAlex
W2113163407
Cited by
466
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
27.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
consideration of future consequences, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, exercise behavior, healthy eating, health behavior, individual differences, intertemporal choice
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Eating, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Forecasting, Health Promotion, Humans, Orientation, Personality, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Time Perception, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review