Cited by 25Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial Power and Status Dynamics

For the Sake of the Eternal Group: Perceiving the Group as Trans-Generational and Endurance of Ingroup Suffering

Kahn, Dennis T., Klar, Yechiel, Roccas, Sonia·2017·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

We introduce the distinction between perceiving the group as Intra-Generational (IG; including only the present generation of group members) and Trans-Generational (TG; including all past, present, and future generations of the group). In four studies ( N = 1,265) administered to Jewish Israeli, Palestinian Israeli, American, and Swedish samples, we demonstrate that a tendency to perceive the group as TG is related to willingness to endure ingroup suffering and that this relationship is mediated by the degree to which the interest of the group as a whole is given primacy over the interest of the group as a collection of group members (Primacy of Interest). Furthermore, experimentally raising the salience of the group as TG leads to increased willingness to endure ingroup suffering as compared with raising the salience of the group as IG, and the effect of the TG salience manipulation is mediated by Primacy of Interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167216684123

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who perceive the group as trans-generational are more tolerant of in-group casualties deemed necessary to promote the group's interests.

    “A series of correlational and experimental studies conducted on Israelis, Palestinians, and Swedes demonstrates that individuals who perceive the group as trans-generational are more tolerant of in-group casualties that are deemed necessary to promote the group’s interests.”

    From Collective Trauma and the Social Construction of Meaning (2018) · cites this paper as Kahn et al., 2017

  • Individuals who include past and future group members in their definition of the group are more likely to find the lives of present group members dispensable if this sacrifice is believed to promote group continuity.

    “Namely, individuals who include past and future group members in their definition of the group are more likely to find the lives of present group members dispensable if this sacrifice is believed to promote group continuity.”

    From Collective Trauma and the Social Construction of Meaning (2018) · cites this paper as Kahn et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahn, D. T., Klar, Y., & Roccas, S.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
Corresponding author
Kahn, Dennis T.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2017-01-19
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
272-283
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2577664454
Cited by
25
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Open University of Israel
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
intergroup relations, collective identity, altruism
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Behavior, Psychological Distance, Social Identification, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review