CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 283Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Belief in U.S. Government Conspiracies Against Blacks among Black and White College Students: Powerlessness or System Blame?

Crocker, Jennifer, Luhtanen, Riia, Broadnax, Stephanie, Blaine, Bruce Evan·1999·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/01461672992511003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Black Americans are far more likely than White Americans to endorse theories about conspiracies by the U.S. government against Blacks. The present study explored the predictors of these conspiracy beliefs for 91 Black and 96 White college students. Two explanations for belief in these conspiracies were considered, one focusing on political powerless and externality of attributions and the other focusing on system blame for Blacks’ disadvantaged status. Regression analyses supported the view that belief in these conspiracy theories is related to blaming problems of Black Americans on prejudice and discrimination. Race was a powerful predictor of belief in these conspiracies even when socioeconomic status was controlled. Furthermore, the race effect was partially mediated by the system blame measure but not by political powerlessness or greater externality of attributional style. System blame was a much stronger predictor of conspiracy beliefs for Black than for White students. Conspiracy beliefs were positively associated with the racial self-esteem of Black students and negatively for White students. Clinical implications and implications for intergroup relations are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672992511003

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. DeParle, J., 1990, New York Times, B7
  2. DeParle, J., 1991, The New York Times, E 5
  3. Katz, I., 1981, Stigma: A social-psychological perspective
  4. Steele, S., 1990, The content of our character, 127
  5. Steele, C. M., 1992, The Atlantic, 269, 68

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 283

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Hofstra University (US)
Corresponding author
Crocker, Jennifer
ORCID
Crocker, Jennifer
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1999-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
941-953
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/01461672992511003
OpenAlex
W2098726774
Semantic Scholar
2be566a63b67b25bb96c5a28b5ba5fc70cb4cfbd
Cited by
283
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
21.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
conspiracy beliefs, racial prejudice, political impotence, attributional style, racial differences, African American college students, White college students, intergroup relations, socioeconomic status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review