Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection

Gutierres, Sara E., Kenrick, Douglas T., Partch, Jenifer J.·1999·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

An experimental study examined the effects of exposure to physically attractive and dominant same-sex individuals on self-assessments. Consistent with prior findings on mate selection, it was predicted that women’s self-assessments of their mate value would be adversely affected by exposure to highly physically attractive women and would be relatively unaffected by exposure to socially dominant women. Conversely, men’s self-assessments of their mate value were expected to be more affected by the social dominance than by the physical attractiveness of the men to whom they were exposed. Findings for self-assessed judgments of desirability as a marriage partner were in line with hypotheses. Results fit with earlier findings suggesting that such effects may be caused by changes in the perceived population of competitors rather than direct changes in self-perceptions of physical appearance or dominance. Overall, findings are supportive of models assuming domain-specific rather than domain-general cognitive processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672992512006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.717 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.717 · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0146167283093004 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · Paper page
  5. Cunningham, P. B., 1997, Evolutionary social psychology
  6. Daly, M., 1983, Sex, evolution, and behavior
  7. Dijkstra, P., meetings of Human Behavior and Evolution Society
  8. Guttentag, M., 1983, Too many women? The sex ratio question
  9. 10.1016/0162-3095(84)90011-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951 · Paper page
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.131 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.131 · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90010-3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1017/S0140525X00067595 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1166 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0146167294202008 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kenrick, D. T., Evolutionary psychology: Theories and issues
  18. Kenrick, D. T., 1989, Review of personality and social psychology: 10 close relationships, 92
  19. Keppel, G., 1991, Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook
  20. 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90017-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/01461672982412004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1086/209242 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.730 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.730 · Paper page
  24. Symons, D., 1979, The evolution of human sexuality
  25. Tooby, J., 1992, The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, 19, 10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/0162-3095(89)90002-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/BF01542229 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Trivers, R. L., 1972, Sexual selection and the descent of man, 136
  29. 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90001-9 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T., & Partch, J. J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1999-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1126-1134
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2126360028
Cited by
171
References
2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/01461672992512006
The paper
Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T., & Partch, J. J. (1999). Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.