CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 379Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMedia Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Systematic Influence of Gain-and Loss-Framed Messages on Interest in and Use of Different Types of Health Behavior

Rothman, Alexander J., Martino, Steven C., Bedell, Brian T., Detweiler, Jerusha B., Salovey, Peter·1999·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167299259003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Framing health messages systematically in terms of either gains or losses influences the behaviors that people adopt. Rothman and Salovey proposed that the relative influence of gain-and loss-framed messages is contingent on people’s perception of the risk or uncertainty associated with adopting the recommended behavior. Specifically, loss-framed messages are more effective when promoting illness-detecting (screening) behaviors, but gain-framed messages are more effective when promoting health-affirming (prevention) behaviors. Two experiments provide a direct test of this conceptual framework. In Experiment 1, participants’ willingness to act after reading about a new disease was a function of how the information was framed and the type of behavior promoted. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings with a real health concern—gum disease. Gain-framed pamphlets heightened interest in a plaque-fighting mouth rinse, whereas loss-framed pamphlets heightened interest in a plaque-detecting disclosing rinse. Research on message framing provides a theoretically based guide for the development of effective health messages.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167299259003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Eagly, A. H., 1993, The psychology of attitudes
  2. McGuire, W. J., 1991, Advances in social cognition, 1
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500 · DOI
  4. Meyerowitz, B. E., annual convention of the American Psychological Society
  5. Rothman, A. J., 1997, Predicting preferences in the domains of gains and losses: The importance of knowing when a gain is a gain and a loss is a loss
  6. Rothman, A. J., annual meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 378

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Rothman, Alexander J.
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1999-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1355-1369
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167299259003
OpenAlex
W2011206369
Cited by
379
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
message framing, gain-framed messages, loss-framed messages, health behavior, risk perception, uncertainty, screening behavior, preventive behavior, health communication, periodontal disease, dental plaque, mouthwash, health pamphlets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review