The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model
Open accessAbstract
Unidimensional item response theory (IRT) has be come widely used in the analysis and equating of edu cational achievement tests. If an IRT model is true, item responses must be locally independent when the trait is held constant. This paper presents several mea sures of local dependence that are used in conjunction with the three-parameter logistic model in the analysis of unidimensional and two-dimensional simulated data and in the analysis of three mathematics achievement tests at Grades 3 and 6. The measures of local depen dence (called Q 2 and Q 3) were useful for identifying subsets of items that were influenced by the same fac tors (simulated data) or that had similar content (real data). Item pairs with high Q 2 or Q 3 values tended to have similar item parameters, but most items with similar item parameters did not have high Q 2 or Q 3 values. Sets of locally dependent items tended to be difficult and discriminating if the items involved an accumulation of the skills involved in the easier items in the rest of the test. Locally dependent items that were independent of the other items in the test did not have unusually high or low difficulties or discrimina tions. Substantial unsystematic errors of equating were found from the equating of tests involving collections of different dimensions, but substantial systematic er rors of equating were only found when the two tests measured quite different dimensions that were presum ably taught sequentially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cloitre, M., Shevlin, M., Brewin, C. R., Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Maercker, A., Karatzias, T., & Hyland, P. (2018) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12956 · Cited by 1,314
Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Shablesky-Cade, M. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2010) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/33.6.781 · Cited by 850
Scaling Performance Assessments: Strategies for Managing Local Item Dependence
Yen, W. M. (1993) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x · Cited by 744
Self-citationHornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165 · Cited by 276
Applied Measurement with jMetrik
Meyer, J. P. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9780203115190 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Yen, W. M.
- Venue
- Applied Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-145
- ISSN
- 0146-6216 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3497
- OpenAlex
- W2524369579
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014662168400800201
- The paper
- Yen, W. M. (1984). Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.