Cited by 1,314Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self‐report measure of ICD‐11 PTSD and complex PTSD

Open access
Cloitre, M., Shevlin, M., Brewin, C. R., Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Maercker, A., Karatzias, T., Hyland, P.·2018·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to finalize the development of the International Trauma Questionnaire ( ITQ ), a self‐report diagnostic measure of post‐traumatic stress disorder ( PTSD ) and complex PTSD ( CPTSD ), as defined in the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases ( ICD ‐11). Method: The optimal symptom indicators of PTSD and CPTSD were identified by applying item response theory ( IRT ) analysis to data from a trauma‐exposed community sample ( n = 1051) and a trauma‐exposed clinical sample ( n = 247) from the United Kingdom. The validity of the optimized 12‐item ITQ was assessed with confirmatory factor analyses. Diagnostic rates were estimated and compared to previous validation studies. Results: The latent structure of the 12‐item, optimized ITQ was consistent with prior findings, and diagnostic rates of PTSD and CPTSD were in line with previous estimates. Conclusion: The ITQ is a brief, simply worded measure of the core features of PTSD and CPTSD . It is consistent with the organizing principles of the ICD ‐11 to maximize clinical utility and international applicability through a focus on a limited but central set of symptoms. The measure is freely available and can be found in the body of this paper.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12956

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirically validated cPTSD interview guides have been developed, including the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for adults and children, and the Developmental Trauma Disorder Semi-structured Interview (DTD-SI) for children and adolescents.

    “Empirically validated cPTSD interview guides have been developed, including the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for adults [21] and children [66], and the Developmental Trauma Disorder Semi-structured Interview (DTD-SI) for children and adolescents [46, 174].”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract and Discussion identify the ITQ as a developed and psychometrically assessed measure of PTSD and CPTSD; Participants and procedures describes adult samples. But the paper explicitly calls it a self-report measure, not an interview guide. The citations for the child ITQ and DTD-SI are separate and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CPTSD was mainly assessed through self-report questionnaires, most commonly the International Trauma Questionnaire.

    “CPTSD was mainly assessed through self-report questionnaires, most commonly with the International Trauma Questionnaire (45).”

    From Tracing the paths: a systematic review of mediators of complex trauma and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Introduction identifies the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) as a self-report measure of PTSD and CPTSD, and the study uses it to assess CPTSD. The paper does not establish that CPTSD was mainly assessed through self-report questionnaires or that the ITQ was the most commonly used measure across studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only one study measured CPTSD, using the International Trauma Questionnaire.

    “Notably, only one study (Dokkedahl et al., 2021) measured CPTSD by using the International Trauma Questionnaire (Cloitre et al., 2018).”
  • A self-report measure for complex PTSD has been validated, translated into over 25 languages, and made available to the international community.

    “A self-report measure has now been validated 30 , translated into over 25 languages, and made available to the international community”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cloitre, M., Shevlin, M., Brewin, C. R., Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Maercker, A., Karatzias, T., & Hyland, P.
Affiliations
  • National Center for PTSD Dissemination and Training Division VA Palo Alto Health Care System Palo Alto CA USA
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • National College of Ireland (IE)
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-03
Volume
138
Issue
6
Pages
536-546
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2892364332
Cited by
1,314
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 236 · 2025: 267 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
81.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
International Trauma Questionnaire, post-traumatic stress disorder, complex PTSD, ICD-11, item response theory, factor structure, diagnostic rate, trauma exposure, brief screening instrument
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, International Classification of Diseases, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review