The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Empirical Test of the Utility of the Observations-To-Variables Ratio in Factor and Components Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Many researchers have proposed a minimum ratio of observations to variables or an absolute minimum of observations in order to obtain stable factor config urations. However, hardly any empirical studies em ploying real data are available that attest to the tena bility of these proposals. A systematic analysis of the problem was undertaken, using self-report data from two large phobic samples on the Fear Survey Sched ule-III (N = 1104) and the Fear Questionnaire ( N = 960). The data sets were randomly split into subsam ples with ratios varying from 1.3:1 to 19.8:1. Neither the observations to variables ratio nor an absolute minimum of observations had any influence on factor stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272 · Cited by 9,587
Sample size in factor analysis.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84 · Cited by 5,497
Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 · Cited by 2,880
The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343603 · Cited by 2,303
Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses
Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4 · Cited by 1,704
Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery.
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.2.231 · Cited by 998
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 · Cited by 454
Minimizing Sample Size When Using Exploratory Factor Analysis for Measurement
Sapnas, K. G., & Zeller, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/jnum.10.2.135.52552 · Cited by 405
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006 · Cited by 276
Bachelor, A. (2013) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.792 · Cited by 203
Psychometric analysis of the family empowerment scale
Singh, N. N., Curtis, W. J., Ellis, C. R., Nicholson, M. W., Villani, T. M., & Wechsler, H. A. (1995) · Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/106342669500300203 · Cited by 162
Katigbak, M. S., Church, A. T., Guanzon-Lapeña, M. A., Carlota, A. J., & del Pilar, G. H. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.89 · Cited by 110
Wass, S. V., & Smith, T. J. (2014) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12049 · Cited by 83
Do, T. T. H., Bui, Q. T. T., Ha, B. T. T., Le, T. M., Le, V. T., Nguyen, Q.-C. T., Lakin, K. J., Dang, T. T., Bui, L. V., Le, T. C., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s404993 · Cited by 20
Eide, H., Leren, L., & Sørebø, Ø. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1198427 · Cited by 19
User-centered design strategies for age-friendly mobile news apps
Jiang, Q., Deng, L., Zhang, J., & Pengbo, Y. (2024) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241285393 · Cited by 18
“A total of 124 valid samples were involved in the factor analysis, meeting the recommended sample size for factor analysis (Arrindell & Van der Ende, 1985; MacCallum et al., 1999).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Arrindell, W. A., & van der Ende, J.
- Venue
- Applied Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-178
- ISSN
- 0146-6216 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3497
- OpenAlex
- W2062532911
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
