The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial Reporting Transparency
Abstract
This discussion raises issues concerning financial reporting transparency. We first observe that transparency is not well-defined in a financial reporting context. Extrapolating from the ways transparency is used in other contexts, we define financial reporting transparency as the extent to which financial reports reveal an entity's underlying economics in a way that is readily understandable by those using the financial reports. We discuss limitations of this definition relating to its two components, but observe that the conceptual frameworks of the IASB and FASB provide a standard setter perspective on them. We next point out that theoretical research suggests that increased reporting transparency can reduce the cost of capital provided that transparency reduces information risk, and empirical research using a variety of measures of financial reporting transparency provides evidence of an association between transparency and cost of capital. Thus, research supports the notion that transparency is a desirable characteristic of financial reports. Given this potential benefit, we then identify characteristics of financial reporting that foster transparency - either by better reflecting the firm's underlying economics or by enhancing the understandability of information in financial reports. Finally, we describe the challenges to achieving financial reporting transparency globally and discuss how the IASB is attempting to address them. Our discussion implies several standard setting actions that might increase financial reporting transparency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250042 · Cited by 18,025
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x · Cited by 11,584
Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading
Kyle, A. S. (1985) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913210 · Cited by 9,580
The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors
Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35 · Cited by 5,152
Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90065-6 · Cited by 5,090
Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital
DIAMOND, D. W., & VERRECCHIA, R. E. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x · Cited by 3,836
Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital.
Botosan, C. A. (1997) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-9709240185 · Cited by 3,436
The market pricing of accruals quality
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003 · Cited by 3,087
Self-citation
Cited by
Decoding the impact of firm‐level ESG performance on financial disclosure quality
Ferdous, L. T., Rana, T., & Yeboah, R. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3982 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Barth, M. E., & Schipper, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-190
- ISSN
- 0148-558X (ISSN-L)
- 2160-4061
- OpenAlex
- W1590592679
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial Reporting Transparency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0148558x0802300203
- The paper
- Barth, M. E., & Schipper, K. (2008). Financial Reporting Transparency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x0802300203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.