Cited by 27Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyRespiratory Support and MechanismsNosocomial Infections in ICU

Modulation of Dietary Lipid Composition During Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Santacruz, Carlos A., Orbegozo, Diego, Vincent, Jean‐Louis, Preiser, Jean Charles·2015·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: Pharmaconutrition including omega‐3 and competitive analogs of omega‐6 fatty acids has been used to modulate the inflammatory response during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The clinical benefit of this approach when assessed in prospective randomized clinical trials has been inconsistent. We tried to assess the reasons for the conflicting results, including the possible influence of the composition of the control solution. Methods: We collected data from studies listed in PubMed, Ovid, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, the U.S. National Institute of Health database, and the ARDSnet database up to March 2013. We included all trials that evaluated effects of enteral pharmaconutrition vs a control solution on mortality, ventilator‐free days, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and ICU‐free days. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to study the influence of the lipid content of the control solution. Results: We found 7 eligible studies (802 patients; 405 randomized to pharmaconutrition). The aggregated results showed no overall effect on mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83 [0.55–1.25], P = .37), but there was a mortality benefit when only studies in which pharmaconutrition was compared to a lipid‐rich control solution were considered (RR = 0.57 [0.41–0.78], P < .001). ICU LOS was shorter in patients randomized to pharmaconutrition (RR = 0.5 [0.85–0.16]). Conclusion: Use of enteral pharmaconutrition in patients with ARDS was associated with decreased mortality only when the comparator solution contained a greater amount of lipid than is currently recommended. Hence, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of enteral pharmaconutrition in ARDS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607114562913

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Santacruz Herrera et al. reported that enteral substitution including ω-3 PUFAs and competitive analogs of ω-6 PUFAs was associated with decreased mortality when the comparator solution contained a higher quantity of ω-6 PUFAs and a far greater amount of lipid than recommended in clinical practice.

    “Analyzing the same ARDS patient population, Santacruz Herrera et al. reported that enteral substitution including ω-3 PUFAs and competitive analogs of ω-6 PUFAs was associated with decreased mortality when the comparator solution contained a higher quantity of ω-6 PUFAs and a far greater amount of lipid than recommended in clinical practice [69].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [69]

  • In the study of pre-emptive administration, membrane content of EPA and DHA was very low at baseline and was hardly corrected with omega-3 and borage oil administration.

    “In this study, the membrane content of EPA and DHA was very low at baseline and was hardly corrected with omega-3 and borage oil administration”
  • Enteral formulae enriched in borage oil and/or omega-3 fatty acids have been administered in patients suffering from ARDS, acute lung injury and sepsis with positive effects regarding length of stay, length of ventilation and even mortality.

    “Enteral formulae enriched in borage oil and/or omega-3 FA have been administered in patients suffering from ARDS, acute lung injury (ALI) and sepsis with positive effects regarding length of stay, length of ventilation and even mortality (239,240,245,248).”
  • Pre-emptive administration of the same formula administered in the first 3 studies in severe, ventilated, multiple trauma patients did not find any advantage.

    “The pre-emptive administration of the same formula administered in the first 3 studies in severe, ventilated, multiple trauma patients did not find any advantage (245).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santacruz, C. A., Orbegozo, D., Vincent, J., & Preiser, J. C.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Santacruz, Carlos A.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-05
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
837-846
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W1998223412
Cited by
27
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
acute respiratory distress syndrome, omega-3 fatty acids, dietary fat composition, mortality, ICU length of stay, ventilator-free days, inflammation
MeSH terms
Dietary Fats, Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Fatty Acids, Omega-6, Parenteral Nutrition Solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review