Cited by 139Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyGastrointestinal motility and disordersEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Reduction in Diarrhea Incidence by Soluble Fiber in Patients Receiving Total or Supplemental Enteral Nutrition

Homann, H.‐H., Kemen, M., Fuessenich, C., Senkal, M., Zumtobel, V.·1994·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background Gastrointestinal side effects, particularly diarrhea, are still the main reasons for discontinuation of enteral nutrition. Although the causes of diarrhea are diverse, the enteral nutrition solution is frequently suspected of playing a leading role in causing diarrhea. Methods Our randomized, prospective, double-blind trial with 100 patients assessed the effects of feeding a standard diet (Nutrodrip Standard) vs the same diet supplemented with 20 g of soluble fiber, containing partially hydrolyzed guar gum (Sunfiber), per 1000 mL. Thirty patients received total enteral nutrition postoperatively, and 70 patients received enteral supplementation. Results The patients receiving total enteral nutrition with soluble fiber had decreased diarrhea but increased flatulence. In none of these patients did enteral feeding have to be discontinued because of gastrointestinal side effects, whereas in four patients who were on a standard diet, enteral feeding had to be interrupted because of diarrhea (p Conclusions Enteral feeding with a formula supplemented with partially hydrolyzed guar gum reduces the incidence of diarrhea in patients receiving total enteral nutrition as well as in those receiving enteral supplementation, regardless of the cause of diarrhea. The increased hydrogen production and the significantly higher rate of flatulence are likely to result from fermentation of the soluble fiber in the colon, with concomitant production of short-chain fatty acids, which leads…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607194018006486

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiber-containing products for enteral nutrition have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function.

    “Conversely, fiber-containing products for EN have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and are, thus, generally recommended.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Homann, H. ‐., Kemen, M., Fuessenich, C., Senkal, M., & Zumtobel, V.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-11
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
486-490
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2034330480
Cited by
139
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
diarrhea, soluble dietary fiber, guar gum, enteral nutrition, enteral supplementation, total parenteral nutrition, flatulence, colonic fermentation, short-chain fatty acids, colonic transit time, cholecystokinin, gastrointestinal adverse effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Diarrhea, Dietary Fiber, Double-Blind Method, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Galactans, Humans, Male, Mannans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Solubility, Plant Gums

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review