The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Microfoundations of Innovation: The Role of Relational Stars
Abstract
Conceptualizing new knowledge development as a process of search and recombination, we suggest that a focus on individual productivity alone presents an undersocialized view of human capital. Rather, we emphasize the importance of embedded relationships by individuals to effectively perform knowledge-generating activities. We rely on intraorganizational knowledge networks emerging through individual collaboration to identify actors who can positively influence their organization’s knowledge outcomes. We study two types of such relational stars: integrators (outliers in centrality) and connectors (outliers in bridging behavior). We test our ideas using the patenting portfolios of 106 pharmaceutical firms from 1974 to 1998 predicting the effect of relational stars on their firm’s quantity and quality of inventive output—proxies for the firm’s capacity to develop more and better new knowledge stocks. We find that the presence of relational stars results in firm-level knowledge advantages not only through their own superior recombinant efforts, but also through their capacity to make others around them more effective at knowledge recombination. Relational stars are firm-specific, and their advantages are socially complex and causally ambiguous because they rely on a network of within-firm interactions. Relational stars, therefore, are prime candidates to be a source of sustainable firm-level knowledge advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 2×
“The simple observation that knowledge is the key raw material for innovation (Nonaka, 1994) combined with the recognition of individual actions and interactions as an appropriate locus of knowledge (Felin & Hesterly, 2007), however, directed attention to the role of individuals as the…”
BackgroundToward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 3×
“Scholars have convincingly argued that innovative organizations are those with superior routines (Nelson & Winter, 1982), capabilities (Kogut & Zander, 1992), competences (Henderson & Cockburn, 1994), or dynamic capabilities (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997).”
BackgroundSocial Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 1×
“New knowledge comes from effective knowledge sharing (Hansen, 1999), search (Gavetti & Levinthal, 2000; Katila & Ahuja, 2002), transfer (Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998), recombination (Galunic & Rodan, 1998), reconfiguration (Henderson & Cockburn, 1994), diffusion (Zollo & Winter, 2002), and renewal…”
Structural Holes and Good Ideas
Burt, R. S. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421787 · Cited by 5,642
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146 · cited 2×
“Alternatively, they may appropriate all or most of the value that they generate or threaten to leave the organization and transfer their knowledge to competitors (Almeida & Kogut, 1999).”
BackgroundLocalization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 · Cited by 2,565
Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization
Brass, D. J. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392937 · Cited by 1,549
Cited by
Salvato, C., Reuer, J. J., & Battigalli, P. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0001 · Cited by 86
Multihoming within Platform Ecosystems: The Strategic Role of Human Capital
Venkataraman, V., Ceccagnoli, M., & Forman, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3134846 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 586-615
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2098188281
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 26.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Microfoundations of Innovation: The Role of Relational Stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206313513612
- The paper
- Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2014). Structural Microfoundations of Innovation: The Role of Relational Stars. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313513612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.