The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking About Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Review and Research Agenda
Abstract
Judgment and decision-making research has a long tradition in management and represents a substantial stream of research in entrepreneurship. Despite numerous reviews of this topic in the organizational behavior, psychology, and marketing fields, this is the first review in the field of entrepreneurship. This absence of a review of entrepreneurial decision making is surprising given the extreme decision-making context faced by many entrepreneurs—such as high uncertainty, time pressure, emotionally charged, and consequential extremes—and the large number of studies in the literature (e.g., 602 articles in our initial screen and 156 articles in a refined search). In this review, we (1) inductively categorize the articles into decision-making topics arranged along the primary activities associated with entrepreneurship—opportunity assessment decisions, entrepreneurial entry decisions, decisions about exploiting opportunities, entrepreneurial exit decisions, heuristics and biases in the decision-making context, characteristics of the entrepreneurial decision maker, and environment as decision context; (2) analyze each context using a general decision-making framework; (3) review and integrate studies within and across decision-making activities; and (4) offer a comprehensive agenda for future research. We believe (hope) that this proposed review, integration, and research agenda will make a valuable contribution to management scholars interested in decision making and/or entrepreneurship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0 · Cited by 5,994
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
Bandura, A. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 · Cited by 4,228
Does self-efficacy affect entrepreneurial investment?
Cassar, G., & Friedman, H. (2009) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.73 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945
Self-citationThe Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide
Shepherd, D. A., & Gruber, M. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719899415 · Cited by 459
Self-citationMeißner, M., & Oll, J. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117744882 · Cited by 131
Miao, C., Coombs, J. E., Qian, S., & Sirmon, D. G. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.016 · Cited by 126
Murnieks, C. Y., Arthurs, J. D., Cardon, M. S., Farah, N., Stornelli, J., & Michael Haynie, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.12.004 · Cited by 88
Engel, Y., Ramesh, A., & Steiner, N. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105986 · Cited by 76
Bischoff, K. M., Gielnik, M. M., & Frese, M. (2020) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1364 · Cited by 64
How data-driven entrepreneur analyzes imperfect information for business opportunity evaluation
Canakoglu, E., Erzurumlu, S. S., & Erzurumlu, Y. O. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2018.2826983 · Cited by 47
How Does AI Improve Human Decision-Making? Evidence from the AI-Powered Go Program
Choi, S., Kim, N., Kim, J., & Kang, H. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3893835 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-46
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2143701580
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 64.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.