The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signaling Theory: State of the Theory and Its Future
Abstract
Signaling theory is about decision-making and communication. It describes scenarios where signalers send observable signals that carry credible information about unobservable qualities. When decision-makers have incomplete or imperfect information, signals can help them make better decisions. The power of a signal, though, lies in its cost, with the best signals being highly costly for low-quality signalers and less costly for high-quality signalers. Given the centrality of these ideas in the organizational sciences, we examine management studies that use signaling theory to help explain phenomena that occur within and among organizations. Our review draws attention to how signaling theorists have introduced important complexities to the signaling process, uncovered theoretical boundary conditions of signaling, described new actors within signaling systems, and demonstrated novel ways to apply signaling theory to understand behavior in an array of research contexts involving a wide range of organizational stakeholders. We also offer ideas about how scholars can account for costs when they apply the theory, extend the theory in more organizational settings, and create abstract extensions of the theory’s major concepts. Our intent is to provide researchers with a panoramic perspective on the state of signaling theory and inspire further development so that we can collectively advance signaling theory as much in the next decade as it has advanced in the last.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spence, M. (1973) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882010 · Cited by 16,171
Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310388419 · Cited by 6,735
Self-citationSignaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets
Spence, M. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/00028280260136200 · Cited by 2,435
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs
Fearon, J. D. (1997) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002797041001004 · Cited by 1,141
Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital
Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/427115 · Cited by 907
Rethinking Sustained Competitive Advantage from Human Capital
Campbell, B. A., Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0276 · Cited by 763
Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review.
Kimchi, R. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.24 · Cited by 742
Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0848 · Cited by 722
Bergh, D. D., Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Shannon, L. M. (2014) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12097 · Cited by 707
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Reutzel, C. R., DesJardine, M. R., & Zhou, Y. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-09-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-61
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W4402225069
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 227.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signaling Theory: State of the Theory and Its Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/01492063241268459
- The paper
- Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Reutzel, C. R., DesJardine, M. R., & Zhou, Y. S. (2025). Signaling Theory: State of the Theory and Its Future. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241268459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.