Cited by 157Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The Role of Psychological and Developmental Science in Efforts to Improve Teacher Quality

Rimm-Kaufman, Sara E., Hamre, Bridget K.·2010·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Background: Theory, methods, and knowledge gained from years of study in psychological science and human development apply to the understanding and improvement of teacher quality and, ultimately, student achievement and social and emotional outcomes. With these applications, educational research has stronger potential to make more effective and systematic contributions to the improvement of teaching in American schools. This potential can be realized by linking the scientific study of psychology and teachers’ development (social, relational, psychological, and cognitive) to teachers’ classroom behaviors (the mechanisms and processes underlying quality) and student achievement of educational and social and emotional objectives (the outputs of quality). New funds of knowledge in developmental and psychological science can serve as a basis for future research on inputs into teacher quality. Purpose: The present article advances an interdisciplinary perspective on the factors influencing teacher quality, specifically defined as teachers’ practices and their interactions with students that can be shown to relate to student achievement. The article (1) offers a view of teacher quality focused on teacher–child interactions that serve as explanatory mechanisms in predicting children's achievement; (2) introduces key principles of human adult development that offer insights to link developmental research on teachers to teacher quality and, ultimately, to student achievement and social and emotional outcomes; and (3) discusses two bodies of research from psychological science that illustrate the ways in which psychological principles and an overarching view of teachers as developing people may contribute to current debates about teacher quality. Research Design: The article synthesizes research from the fields of education and psychology. Conclusions: The article closes with recommendations for basic, developmentally oriented research on teacher quality and student achievement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016146811011201204

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Hamre, B. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2010-11
Volume
112
Issue
12
Pages
2988-3023
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W245440419
Cited by
157
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
teacher quality, teacher professional development, teacher-child interaction, academic performance, social-emotional outcomes, adult development, teacher practices, classroom behavior, interdisciplinary research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review