Cited by 31Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Exploring the Interplay of Trait Emotional Intelligence and ESL Teacher Effectiveness: Is Self-Efficacy the Mechanism Linking Them?

Open access
Anwar, Rahila Huma, Zaki, Sajida, Memon, Natasha, Thurasamy, Ramayah·2021·Sage Open

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of trait emotional intelligence (EI) and self-efficacy (SE) on English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers’ effectiveness (TE). The study also explored the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy in augmenting the relationship between trait EI and teacher effectiveness. We adopted a quantitative survey design involving both public and private sector higher education institutions (HEIs) of Pakistan. The participants ( N = 243 ESL teachers) were selected via convenience sampling. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS3 software. Analysis through standard bootstrapping procedure resulted in direct and indirect (mediation analysis) path coefficients. Trait EI predicted ESL teachers’ effectiveness and self-efficacy. However, teacher self-efficacy was found to be more important as it revealed a larger effect on teacher effectiveness than trait EI and also mediated the relationship between trait EI and teacher effectiveness. The findings support previous research that positions emotional intelligence at the core of teaching effectiveness and has highlighted the predominant role that self-efficacy can play in strengthening this relationship. This study is significant as it underscored the importance of trait EI and self-efficacy in facilitating teacher effectiveness at the tertiary level. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/21582440211061378

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Anwar, R. H., Zaki, S., Memon, N., & Thurasamy, R.
Affiliations
  • NED University of Engineering and Technology (PK)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia
Corresponding author
Anwar, Rahila Huma
Venue
Sage Open
Published
2021-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
ISSN
2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215110333
Cited by
31
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
trait emotional intelligence, teacher self-efficacy, teacher effectiveness, ESL teachers, English as a second language teaching, mediation, university teaching, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review