Professional Learning for Using Data: Examining Teacher Needs & Supports
Abstract
Background: In the last few decades, a focus on school accountability at the state and federal levels has created expectations for teachers to attend to data in increasingly structured ways. Although professional learning is often cited as an important facilitator of effective data use, research that focuses on the intersection of professional learning and data use is scarce. Examining teacher perceptions of data use supports, and contrasting assertions of what is desired in data-related professional learning with accounts of the ways in which this professional learning actually happens provide an avenue for exploring these issues and for building a research base that can inform the work of district and campus leaders as well as support providers. Focus of Study: This study aimed at examining teacher needs specific to data-related professional learning through a lens informed by knowledge-based organizational learning. We were guided by two broad questions: (a) What knowledge and skills do teachers need in order to engage in data-informed practice? (b) How do professional learning supports address these needs? Research Design: The qualitative study draws on document analysis as well as interview and focus group data collected from n=110 participants (teachers, school leaders, and district support staff) in three school districts in central Texas. Flexible a priori coding rooted in our conceptual framework was employed to examine data for themes common across district settings and across school levels (e.g., elementary, middle, high). Code counts were used to further examine areas of professional learning focus and/or apparent imbalance. Findings: Educators articulated professional learning needs related to data use in six main areas: (a) asking appropriate questions of data (to guide analysis and use); (b) accessing and operating district data systems; (c) data literacy/interpretation; (d) fitting data use with day-do-day practice; (e) sharing information via collaboration; and (f) knowledge codifica-tion. Of these, data capture via computer data systems was by far the most prominent focus reported by educators in each district. Clear plans for addressing data use capacity through professional learning supports were lacking. Recommendations: Taking into account teacher perspectives on what professional learning for data use was needed and on how such supports were, in reality, structured, we make three recommendations: (a) purposefully embed professional learning for data use in ongoing organizational routines; (b) mitigate the district level silos that separate training-on-computer-systems from professional learning focused on turning data into action at the classroom level; and (c) seek balance in supporting the constellation of knowledge and skills that contribute to data use capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers' actual proficiencies in data-driven decision-making remain relatively low.
“Despite many studies on DDDM, teachers' actual proficiencies remain relatively low.”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
The availability of support and professional development influences data use.
“Many research have espoused the influence of the availability of support and professional development (e.g.Jimerson & Wayman, 2015;van Geel et al., 2017;Villeneuve & Bouchamma, 2023).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
Remote access is important in promoting effective educational data use.
“Jimerson and Wayman (2015) posit that remote access is important in promoting effective educational data use.”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson and Wayman (2015)
Teachers require adequate time and workload allocation to encourage engagement with data use.
“Teachers require adequate time and workload allocation to encourage engagement with data use (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
This reduces data use amongst teachers.
“and this reduces data use amongst teachers (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015;Jimerson et al., 2021)”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
The ability of teachers to access and use the data system determines its effectiveness in supporting their DDDM practices.
“The ability of teachers to access and use the data system determines its effectiveness in supporting their DDDM practices (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
Teachers' low level of data literacy is widely documented in the literature.
“Teachers' low level of data literacy is widely documented in the literature (e.g.Farley-Ripple et al., 2021;Hellmuth & Stewart, 2015;Jimerson & Wayman, 2015;Jimerson et al., 2021;van Geel et al., 2017;Wayman et al., 2017).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
Teachers want to use data to make practical changes, yet they seem to have low confidence about their decisions based on data.
“Teachers want to use data to make practical changes, yet they seem to have low confidence about their decisions based on data (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
Ineffective school leaders' preparation caused the inefficiencies of data initiatives in some schools.
“Ineffective school leaders' preparation caused the inefficiencies of data initiatives in some schools (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
Personal factors that constrain teacher data use include lack of time and preparation.
“lack of time and preparation (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015;Jimerson et al., 2021;van Geel et al., 2017)”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
The literature mentions a wide range of specific data skills spanning data generation and collection, data analysis, data interpretation and integration, evaluation, and report writing.
“There were a wide range of specific data-skills mentioned in the literature, spanning from data generation and collection (Farley-Ripple et al., 2019; Jimerson & Wayman, 2015) to data analysis (Farley-Ripple et al., 2019; Jimerson & Wayman, 2015; Marsh et al., 2010), data interpretation and integration (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015; Marsh et al., 2010), evaluation (Andersen, 2020; Dunn et al., 2013b;”
From Dimensions of teachers’ data literacy: A systematic review of literature from 1990 to 2021 (2024) · cites this paper as Jimerson & Wayman, 2015
Cites
Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors
Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007 · Cited by 406 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…cite difficulties due to a lack of knowledge of how to effectively use data and a scarcity of quality supports for increasing this knowledge (Louis et al., 2010; Ikemoto & Marsh, 2007; Mandinach & Gummer, 2013; Mandinach & Jackson, 2012; Schildkamp & Kuiper, 2010; Wayman, Cho, & Johnston, 2007).”
BackgroundKerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/505057 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Teachers’ Use of Data: Loose Coupling, Agenda Setting, and Team Norms
Young, V. M. (2006) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/505058 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007) · Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00099.x · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009) · School Leadership & Management · doi:10.1080/13632430903162541 · Cited by 199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…data systems (Wayman, Cho, et al., 2012; Wayman & Cho, 2009), to the lack of a clear vision for the role of data use (Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, & Anderson, 2010; Park & Datnow, 2009), to mistrust among teachers related to past abuses and misuses of data (Earl & Fullan, 2003; Louis et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMarsh, J. A., Sloan McCombs, J., & Martorell, F. (2010) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904809341467 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Data literacy training and use for educational professionals
Henderson, J., & Corry, M. (2021) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-11-2019-0074 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Effects of a data use intervention on educators’ use of knowledge and skills
Ebbeler, J., Poortman, C. L., Schildkamp, K., & Pieters, J. M. (2016) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.11.002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Dimensions of teachers’ data literacy: A systematic review of literature from 1990 to 2021
Lee, J., Alonzo, D., Beswick, K., Abril, J. M. V., Chew, A. W., & Oo, C. Z. (2024) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-024-09435-8 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Powell, S. R., Lembke, E. S., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Petscher, Y., Hwang, J., Bos, S. E., Cox, T., Hirt, S., Mason, E. N., Pruitt-Britton, T., et al. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100897 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Affordances of narrative and numerical data: A social-semiotic approach to data use
Fjørtoft, H., & Lai, M. K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100846 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Implementation of a collaborative data use model in a United States context
Jimerson, J. B., Garry, V., Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100866 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationAlonzo, D., Quimno, V., Townend, G., & Oo, C. Z. (2024) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-024-09443-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Ineffective school leaders’ preparation caused the inefficiencies of data initiatives in some schools (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015).”
InfluentialScience teachers’ data use practices: A descriptive analysis
Snodgrass Rangel, V., Monroy, C., & Bell, E. (2016) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.24.2348 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jimerson, J. B., & Wayman, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Texas Christian University (US)
- ORCID
- Jimerson, Jo Beth
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2259223404
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- data-informed practice, teacher learning, teacher needs, data literacy, school accountability, teacher perceptions, school leadership, teacher collaboration, knowledge codification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review