The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries
Abstract
This research investigates the relationships between knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. We propose statistical hypotheses and a LISREL model to study these based on the data sampled from 170 Taiwanese firms, including electronic, financial insurance and medical industries, yielding 355 valid returned research samples. By testing three hypotheses, this study finds that absorptive capacity is the intervening factor between knowledge sharing and innovation capability. It also shows that knowledge sharing has a positive effect on absorptive capacity, and that a completely mediating model exhibits both model generalization and extension characteristics through multiple model comparison in different industry population samples. Finally, managerial implications are discussed and a brief conclusion is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146 · cited 1×
“In the ‘resource-based’ view of the firm, knowledge is considered to be the most strategically important resource [9].”
BackgroundKnowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence
Liebowitz, J. (2001) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0957-4174(00)00044-0 · Cited by 351
The communal resource and information systems
von Krogh, G. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00006-9 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-09-2018-0568 · Cited by 554
Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1661837 · Cited by 425
Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001 · Cited by 406
System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation
Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C.-C. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.109 · Cited by 375
Self-citationCustomer relationship management: digital transformation and sustainable business model innovation
Gil-Gomez, H., Guerola-Navarro, V., Oltra-Badenes, R., & Lozano-Quilis, J. A. (2020) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2019.1676283 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Liao, S.-H., Fei, W.-C., & Chen, C.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 340-359
- ISSN
- 0165-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6485
- OpenAlex
- W2089672499
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 30.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0165551506070739
- The paper
- Liao, S.-H., Fei, W.-C., & Chen, C.-C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
