The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A ‘Demented Work Ethic’ and a ‘Lifestyle Firm’: Discourse, Identity, and Workplace Time Commitments
Abstract
One key to understanding the contours of late modernity is to examine workers’ allocations of time to their organizations. In this article, I frame workplace time commitments as the outcome of two forces: individuals’ efforts to portray a positive and distinctive identity (identity work) and the organizational and social discourses shaping those identities (identity regulation). Analysis of interviews with 53 employees from two distinct organizations shows that identity work and identity regulation related to workplace time commitments are not the result of totalizing managerial discourses, but are influenced by the arrays of discursive resources proffered by both locales and organizational practices. Importantly, these arrays tend to ‘tilt’ toward agency or structure in the conceptions of the individual–organization relationship they afford. Based on this finding, I argue that studies of workplace control and resistance should examine the features of such arrays of discursive resources, that understanding these assemblies of discursive resources can provide insight on the institutionalization of workplace practices, and that claims about modernity's totalizing influences on identity must be tempered by considering locale-specific discourses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Cited by
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Self-citationIt’s a Bittersweet Symphony, this Life: Fragile Academic Selves and Insecure Identities at Work
Knights, D., & Clarke, C. A. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613508396 · Cited by 441
‘Being regimented’: Aspiration, discipline and identity work in the British parachute regiment
Thornborrow, T., & Brown, A. D. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840608101140 · Cited by 388
Interactions between work and identities: Thriving, withering, or redefining the self?
Kira, M., & Balkin, D. B. (2014) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.10.001 · Cited by 139
Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502768 · Cited by 117
Interrelationships of identity and technology in IT assimilation
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.16 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, T.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1339-1358
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2169282725
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.