The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Informal Collaboration in R & D. The formation of Networks Across Organizations
Abstract
A barter economy is operated by the Danish biotech community. This barter economy is significant as an 'interactional infra-structure' for the emergence and discovery of collaborative R&D venues. Norms of liberally sharing information on the frontier of research greatly enhance the efficiency of the network forma tion process. Our study documents the whole process of informally forming collaborative relations amongst companies and universities in biotech R&D. A model is developed which serves as an interpretive scheme for case studies. The patterns of collaboration depicted in this paper appear to be anarchistic and random, but we argue that these traits are somewhat 'domesticated' by com munity norms. Furthermore, in spite of its strategic importance, networking appears to be totally out of managerial purview and control. However, we suggest that these collaborative relations may in certain, often paradoxical, ways be channelled and conditioned by managerial fiat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600201 · Cited by 1,337
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes
Grandori, A. (1997) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069701800601 · Cited by 368
Testing goodwill: conflict and cooperation in new product development networks
Coles, A. M., Harris, L., & Dickson, K. (2003) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2003.003089 · Cited by 55
Building Innovation Networks: Issues of Strategy and Expertise
Harris, L., Coles, A.-M., & Dickson, K. (2000) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/713698468 · Cited by 47
Gift-Giving as a Conversion Device in Online Marketplaces
Darr, A. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221114463 · Cited by 6
“…authority between workers and their superiors in Japan (Daniels, 2009), as well as inter-organizational relations in the Danish bio-tech industry (Kreiner & Schultz, 1993), ties to the local community through corporate philanthropy (Lombardo, 1995), and ties between expatriates and their home…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreiner, K., & Schultz, M.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-209
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2151109123
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.