The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Professional Culture in Organizational Context
Abstract
This paper formulates a new conceptual framework for understanding profes sional culture in organizational context. Our analysis begins with an attempt to identify the complex interplay between individual sense-making, group beliefs and culture. The process of professionalization and the development of profes sional cultures is described and the influence of professional belief systems on organizational culture is examined. The inter-relationship between four different types of professional subculture and organizational culture is illustrated in a case- study analysis of an Australian home-care service. The stability of an organiza tion's operating environment is identified as a major factor which facilitates and constrains the propensity for professional subcultures to radically transform or incrementally refine dominant organizational cultures. The paper concludes with a critical reappraisal of the significance of professional subculture as a determin ant of an organization's cultural system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Organizational Culture and Leadership
Tierney, W. G., & Schein, E. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258322 · Cited by 9,601
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS
(2010) · INQUIRING MAN: · doi:10.4324/9780203405321_chapter_1 · Cited by 8,573
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393392 · Cited by 3,234
Toward a theory of organizational socialization
Maanen, J. V., & Schein, E. H. (1977) · Cited by 2,793
Surprise and Sense Making: What Newcomers Experience in Entering Unfamiliar Organizational Settings
Louis, M. R. (1980) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392453 · Cited by 2,657
The Professionalization of Everyone?
Wilensky, H. L. (1964) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/223790 · Cited by 2,381
Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge
Chung, K. H., & Ouchi, W. (1982) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257316 · Cited by 1,697
Cited by
Optimising e-learning in healthcare for nurses
Rutkowski, A. F., & Spanjers, R. W. L. (2007) · International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management · doi:10.1504/ijhtm.2007.013168 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloor, G., & Dawson, P.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-295
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2169337130
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Professional Culture in Organizational Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/017084069401500205
- The paper
- Bloor, G., & Dawson, P. (1994). Understanding Professional Culture in Organizational Context. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.