The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity
Abstract
This paper argues that within every organization there is a terrain which is not and cannot be managed, in which people, both individually and in groups, can engage in unsupervised, spontaneous activity. This is referred to as the unmanaged organization, a kind of organizational dreamworld in which desires, anxieties and emotions find expressions in highly irrational construc tions. The chief force in this terrain is fantasy and its landmarks include stories, myths, jokes, gossip, nicknames, graffiti and cartoons. In the organizational dreamworld, emotions prevail over rationality and pleasure over reality. The paper argues that fantasy offers a third possibility to organizational members, which amounts to neither conformity nor rebellion, but to a grudging material acceptance accompanied by a symbolic refashioning of events and official stor ies. Far from being a marginal terrain, it is suggested that the unmanaged organisation is rich, multidimensional and the natural habitat of subjectivity. Four different modes of subjectivity are identified and discussed in connection with different types of organizational narratives: (1) the subject as hero; (2) the subject as heroic survivor; (3) the subject as victim; (4) the subject as object of love.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis
Smircich, L. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392246 · Cited by 4,044
The Storytelling Organization: A Study of Story Performance in an Office- Supply Firm
Boje, D. M. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393432 · Cited by 1,722
Bogue, R., de Certeau, M., & Rendall, S. F. (1986) · Comparative Literature · doi:10.2307/1770399 · Cited by 1,656
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6396 · Cited by 1,375
STRENGTH IS IGNORANCE; SLAVERY IS FREEDOM: MANAGING CULTURE IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS*
Willmott, H. (1993) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x · Cited by 1,318
Postman, N. (1985) · ETC: A Review of General Semantics · doi:10.66774/etc_4201_013 · Cited by 1,117
The Uniqueness Paradox in Organizational Stories
Martin, J., Feldman, M. S., Hatch, M. J., & Sitkin, S. B. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392251 · Cited by 745
In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities
Baudrillard, J., Lotringer, S., Kholti, H. E., & Kraus, C. (1978) · Cited by 427
Consumer Culture and Postmodernism
Singh, P. R. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1689098 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities
Cunliffe, A. L. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267030568004 · Cited by 677
A Narrative Approach to Collective Identities*
Brown, A. D. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00609.x · Cited by 543
On Being Positive: Concerns and Counterpoints
Fineman, S. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.20208680 · Cited by 507
Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity
Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701548001 · Cited by 489
Downing, S. (2005) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00076.x · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabriel, Y.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-501
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2136100803
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/017084069501600305
- The paper
- Gabriel, Y. (1995). The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.