The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures
Abstract
Research on global cooperative ventures has tended to focus on governance forms and task structures. This study highlights the importance of knowledge structures and work systems in influencing the success of collaborative ventures. Based on an empirical analysis of a close collaboration in the knowledge-intensive area between a Japanese and a British high-technology firm, it illustrates how the socially embedded nature of knowledge can impede cross-border collaborative work and knowledge transfer. The research has applied and extended Michael Polanyi's con cept of 'tacit knowledge' in a much wider context. It develops a conceptual frame work for analyzing the main differences and 'points of friction' between the Japanese 'organizational' and the British 'professional' models of the organization of knowledge in high-level technical work. It shows how the dominant form of knowledge held in organizations, its degree of tacitness, and the way in which it is structured, utilized and transmitted can vary considerably between firms in dif ferent societal settings. These differences are shown to have contributed to project failures, weakened the technological relationship between the partner firms over time and led to asymmetry in knowledge transfer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Cited by
The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527456 · Cited by 2,880
Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework
Ipe, M. (2003) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484303257985 · Cited by 1,608
Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams
Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. (2002) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.13.s2.3 · Cited by 452
Choice Between Non-Equity Entry Modes: An Organizational Capability Perspective
Krishna Erramilli, M., Agarwal, S., & Dev, C. S. (2002) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491014 · Cited by 243
Bierema, L. L. (2001) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.40 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, A.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 973-996
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2144307463
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.