The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theorizing Subjectivity in Organizations: The Failure of Foucauldian Studies?
Abstract
This paper examines the promise of Foucault as a vehicle for addressing subjectivity and organizations. It questions the supposed non-essentialism and nondualism of Foucauldian work, and argues that such work has difficulties in theorizing agency, and the relation between self and discourse. Though the paper is critical of previous attacks on the anti-materialistic stance of Foucauldian work, it nevertheless suggests that Foucauldian studies have been unable to adequately theorize 'material' relations, and that they have so far provided an inadequate basis by which to develop an ethics of either individual or collective change. In developing this critique, the paper largely focuses on Foucauldian work rather than the text of Foucault himself, though some attention is paid to Volumes 1 to 3 of The History of Sexuality. Feminist work is also employed in order to illustrate the limitations of Foucault in theorizing the self and subjectivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877
Inventing our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood
Rose, N. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511752179 · Cited by 2,809
Accounting and the construction of the governable person
Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0 · Cited by 1,505
Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline
Grey, C. (1994) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038594028002007 · Cited by 583
Cited by
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502768 · Cited by 117
Governing the ethical consumer: identity, choice and the primary care medical encounter
McDonald, R., Mead, N., Cheraghi‐Sohi, S., Bower, P., Whalley, D., & Roland, M. (2007) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00493.x · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Newton, T.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-447
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2167496317
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theorizing Subjectivity in Organizations: The Failure of Foucauldian Studies? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/017084069801900303
- The paper
- Newton, T. (1998). Theorizing Subjectivity in Organizations: The Failure of Foucauldian Studies? Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.