CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 80Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Religious Involvement and Attitudes Toward Parenting Among Low-Income Urban Women

Hill, Terrence D., Burdette, Amy M., Regnerus, Mark, Angel, Ronald J.·2008·Journal of Family Issues
DOI 10.1177/0192513x07311949
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors employ data from the Welfare, Children, and Families project, a probability sample of 2,402 low-income women with children living in low-income neighborhoods in Boston, Chicago, and San Antonio, to test whether religious attendance is associated with parental satisfaction, perceived parental demands, and parental distress over 2 years. They also consider three potential mediators of the association between religious attendance and attitudes toward parenting: social support, self-esteem, and psychological distress. Results show that women who frequently attend religious services report greater parental satisfaction, perceive fewer parental demands, and report less parental distress than do women who attend less frequently. The authors also find that the mediators under study help to partially explain the relationship between religious attendance and attitudes toward parenting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192513x07311949

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 25 highest-rigor studies on R/S and self-esteem, 17 (68%) reported greater self-esteem and two (8%) found worse self-esteem.

    “Of the 25 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 17 (68%) reported greater self-esteem [91–98] and two (8%) found worse self-esteem [99, 100].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [93]

  • Of the 29 best social support studies, 27 (93%) reported significant positive relationships.

    “Of the 29 best studies, 27 (93%) reported significant positive relationships [82, 267–274].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [267]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hill, T. D., Burdette, A. M., Regnerus, M., & Angel, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, Terrence D.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-01-04
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
882-900
ISSN
  • 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5481
DOI
10.1177/0192513x07311949
OpenAlex
W2126909685
Cited by
80
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
religious service attendance, low-income women, parenting satisfaction, parental demands, parental distress, social support, self-esteem, psychological distress, low-income communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review