Cited by 911Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Religiosity and Mental Health: A Meta–Analysis of Recent Studies

Hackney, Charles H., Sanders, Glenn S.·2003·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

A meta–analysis was performed in an attempt to clarify the proposed relationship between religiosity and psychological adjustment. Specific focus was given to the issue of definition, namely, whether differences in researchers’ conceptualizations of religiosity and mental health could account for the various contradictory findings by psychologists of religion. Analysis of 34 studies conducted during the past 12 years revealed that the definitions of religiosity and mental health utilized by psychologists in this field were indeed associated with different types and strengths of the correlations between religiosity and mental health. Discussion of results assesses the fit between relevant theory and the pattern of change in effect size across categories of religion and adjustment, and concludes with implications for therapeutic uses of religious involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-5906.t01-1-00160

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early studies of mental health utilization among religious people have focused on using secular mental health care providers rather than R/S providers to support coping and reductions in psychological distress.

    “In part because early studies of mental health utilization among religious people have focused on using secular mental health care providers rather than R/S providers to support coping and reductions in psychological distress.32–34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-12
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
43-55
ISSN
  • 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5906
OpenAlex
W2115995607
Cited by
911
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 55
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
religiosity, mental health, psychological adjustment, conceptualization of mental health, religion and psychology, effect size heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review