Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparisons of the Intraocular Tissue Distribution, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of 125I-Labeled Full-Length and Fab Antibodies in Rhesus Monkeys Following Intravitreal Administration

Mordenti, Joyce, Cuthbertson, R. Andrew, Ferrara, Napoleone, Thomsen, Karen, Berleau, Lea, Licko, Vojtech, Allen, Philip C., Valverde, Celia R., Meng, Y. Gloria, Fei, David T.W., Fourre, Kathleen M., Ryan, Anne M.·1999·Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

Access of recombinant proteins to the retina following intravitreal administration is poorly understood. A study was conducted in male Rhesus monkeys (15 to 28 mo of age; 2.8-3.3 kg) in order to compare the intraocular tissue distribution, pharmacokinetics, and safety of 125 Iodine (I)-labeled full-length humanized rhuMAb HER2 antibody (148 kD) and of 125 I-labeled humanized rhuMAb vascular endothelial growth factor Fab antibody (48.3 kD) following bilateral bolus intravitreal injection on day 0 (5 animals/group). The dose administered to each eye was 25 μg (9-10 μCi) in 50 μl. Animals were euthanatized on day 0 (1 hr postdose) and on days 1, 4, 7, and 14. Safety assessment included direct ophthalmoscopy, intraocular pressure measurements, clinical observations, body weight, and hematology and clinical chemistry panels. Blood and vitreous samples were collected daily (blood only) and at necropsy for pharmacokinetics and analysis for antibodies to the test materials; the ocular tissue distribution of the test material was evaluated by microautoradiography. All animals completed the study. Microautoradiography demonstrated that the full-length antibody did not penetrate the inner limiting membrane of the retina at any of the time points examined. In contrast, the Fab antibody fragment diffused through the neural retina to the retinal pigment epithelial layer at the 1-hr time point and persisted in this location for up to 7 days. Systemic exposure to test material was low but variable: the highest plasma concentration of the full-length antibody was 20.3 ng/ml, whereas plasma concentrations for the Fab antibody remained below the limit of quantitation (i.e., <7.8 ng/ml). An immune response to the test material was not evident in either treatment group. The half-life in vitreous was 5.6 days for the full-length antibody and 3.2 days for the Fab antibody. The shorter intravitreal half-life of the Fab antibody is related to its smaller size and its significant diffusion through the retinal layers. The differences in pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution that are noted between the full-length and Fab antibodies in this study identify potential therapeutic approaches that may be exploited in specific disease conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/019262339902700507

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Mordenti, J., Cuthbertson, R. A., Ferrara, N., Thomsen, K., Berleau, L., Licko, V., Allen, P. C., Valverde, C. R., Meng, Y. G., Fei, D. T. W., Fourre, K. M., & Ryan, A. M.
Venue
Toxicologic Pathology
Published
1999-09
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
536-544
ISSN
  • 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1601
OpenAlex
W2096735172
Cited by
350
References
1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparisons of the Intraocular Tissue Distribution, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of 125I-Labeled Full-Length and Fab Antibodies in Rhesus Monkeys Following Intravitreal Administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/019262339902700507
The paper
Mordenti, J., Cuthbertson, R. A., Ferrara, N., Thomsen, K., Berleau, L., Licko, V., Allen, P. C., Valverde, C. R., Meng, Y. G., Fei, D. T. W., Fourre, K. M., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Comparisons of the Intraocular Tissue Distribution, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of 125I-Labeled Full-Length and Fab Antibodies in Rhesus Monkeys Following Intravitreal Administration. Toxicologic Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1177/019262339902700507

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.